User talk:Psychobillypolice

The Quakes

The article still needs to contain reliable sources so that any of the claims in the text can be verified. Please read WP:REF on how to use references. --JD554 (talk) 06:48, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I care because all claims on Wikipedia need to be easily verified. Currently the article doesn't meet Wikipedia's quality standards on verifiability and references, that's why there is the tag at the top of the article. In order to bring the article up to standard, it needs to have inline citations where a claim is made in the article so they can be checked easily. To help you do this you can read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners which has plenty of useful advice. --JD554 (talk) 10:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What more reliable than the bands web site? Are you suggesting that the band made the whole thing up? You wont find this story in a book as there ARE no books about psychobilly bands.

No one is challenging the source. The tag is simply a maintenance tag saying that references should be turned into citations (footnotes), so that it's clear to readers which info is coming from which sources. Please don't revert-war over it, it's really a minor thing and has almost nothing to do with the content of the article. (Oh, and apparently there are books about psychobilly bands: [1] [2]. The Quakes are also discussed in the Alternative Press article used as a source in the psychobilly article...so there are reliable sources out there other than the band's website that could be used.) --IllaZilla (talk) 22:06, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Stalinist tactics do not scare me- If you do not leave this page alone you will be opening up a huge can of worms. Just forget this page exists and leave it alone.

Stalinist tactics? I'm afraid you'll find I don't respond well to threats. --IllaZilla (talk) 03:59, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from The Quakes. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 05:49, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFC/USER discussion concerning you (Psychobillypolice)

Hello, Psychobillypolice. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning your conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by your name in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Psychobillypolice, where you may want to participate. -- IllaZilla (talk) 06:27, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I went and closed it, the conclusion should be read there. Wizardman 19:34, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should you return and continue engaging in unseemly conduct including personal attacks, Wizardman has stated you may be blocked indefinitely. His warning is still in effect as an administrator, despite the modification to the formal conclusion of the RFC. Ncmvocalist (talk) 15:37, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

July 2008

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to The Quakes, without explaining the valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. JD554 (talk) 10:35, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]