User talk:Psy5ive
This is not a duplicate account
[edit]We hired a third party SEO service that did not turn out well. He created poor wikipedia pages and has lied to us about the work he was doing. This account is not his or related to his. This is my own account.
Psy5ive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Not a duplicate account, not a sock puppet. Will verify through any means needed
Decline reason:
You seem to be admitting to meatpuppetry, having a conflict of interest, and attempting to edit promotionally. I don't see any benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you at this time. We will need a lot more detail about your situation and what you want to do here. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Intention
[edit]I do work for the company whose article I originally edited. The problem I have is that this other user has created a page on behalf of this company using completely inaccurate information, poor grammar, misspellings, and weasel words and the results were below anyone's standards. It was basically extremely poorly written advertising for this company in a way that I do not approve and in a way that violates the community guidelines. I am not looking for advertising space on this website. The company is well established (47 years) and I feel that an article should exist with factual, unbiased information and sources, which are plentiful. If the article I published doesn't meet community standards or get a green light with the admins here, that's one thing. I ask that the article then be created by another party thereby removing any conflict of interest. What I am asking for is an honest look at the article I published after the first one was deleted. The article was deleted on the basis of this being a duplicate account and I do not feel that it was given any other consideration. I have been making anonymous edits to Wikipedia pages for spelling, grammar, and punctuation for over 15 years. I registered this account before publishing the article so it wouldn't be published anonymously and be flagged as a duplicate account or assume that it was the original user trying to resubmit content. Apparently that has backfired. With this account I wanted to see that a quality, community compliant Wikipedia page was submitted for this company and I will continue to make page edits to other articles as I find mistakes.
Psy5ive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
You seem to be admitting to violating WP:SOCK, WP:COI, WP:PAID, and WP:PROMO. These are all grounds to leave you blocked. Yamla (talk) 19:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Original block
[edit]Psy5ive (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The original reason for this block is for abusing multiple accounts. I am not using multiple accounts, this is a single account owned by me that is not related to Hydrozen1. Please I ask for a manual review from Sir Sputnik or RHaworth or Liz. If the article I tried to publish doesn't meet the community standards, I would like edit it so that it does or ask for the article to please be created by a neutral party. This is not a duplicate account, I am not a paid contributor, I am not a sockpuppet or meatpuppet, and I am not looking to advertise this company. There is a conflict of interest because I work for this company and I please ask for your help to resolve this. Please let me know if there is anything I can do. Thank you
Decline reason:
Although you may not be the same real-life individual as User:Hydrozen1 and the other accounts, the fact remains that you paid them to edit Wikipedia on a topic with which you have a conflict of interest. As far as we are concerned, that means we should treat you as the same user with multiple accounts - we do not make a distinction between accounts operated by a single real-life individual and accounts operated by different individuals with the same agenda who are colluding off-wiki. As far as being unblocked goes, we will not unblock you as long as we believe you intend to write about your company on Wikipedia. If that is your only purpose here, you are wasting your time requesting an unblock.
If this is not the case and you would like to edit Wikipedia in a personal capacity, on subjects with which you do not have a conflict of interest, you will need to explain what you intend to write about here in future. At the moment, however, all we are hearing from you is, "I want my company to have a Wikipedia article!", and since you are not going to be allowed to create such an article, nor to pay black-hat SEO agents to create the article for you, there is currently no reason to lift this block. Yunshui 雲水 09:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Someone else will review this request, but If you work for the company you tried to edit about, you are a paid editor. Full stop. 331dot (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)i
- Furthermore, you've admitted to violating WP:MEAT: "The problem I have is that this other user has created a page on behalf of this company" --Yamla (talk) 21:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- Okay, I understand what you're saying, 331dot. I assumed that would only fall under conflict of interest, my apologies. Yamla, the page that was created was full of misinformation and was advertising. If the company is to have a page on here, I want it to be factual and a real page, not the drivel that was the original article. I am relieved that the first article from Hydrozen1 was deleted. I only want to fix this. Can this block be lifted and I will put in a request for the page to be created? I am not out to sidestep any of the rules, I legitimately thought the article I published would be okay. Can it be reviewed? What's the best approach here? I will follow any suggestions anyone can give me. Thank you Psy5ive (talk) 22:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)