User talk:Psvillasoto2006

Masalipit is a barangay in San Miguel, Bulacan. It has has population of 2,723 with 525 households as of May 2009. It is one of the farthest barangays of the muniipality.

Masalipit has a complete elementary school, a day care center and a barangay health center. At present, Masalipit is an adopted barangay of Arellano University where various programs on agriculture, leadership capability-building, health and sanitation, environmental protection, among others are initiated by the faculty and students.

AfD nomination of Masalipit

I have nominated Masalipit, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Masalipit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Chzz ► 01:57, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Masalipit. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Ixfd64 (talk) 03:14, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oblates of Notre Dame

The Society of Oblates of Notre Dame (OND) is a religious congregation of women of pontifical right dedicated to the works of the apostolate. It was founded in 1956 in Cotabato, Philippines by two Missionary Oblates of Mary Immaculate (O. M. I.), Father George Dion, OMI subsequently Apostolic Vicar of Jolo and Tawi-Tawi and Archbishop Gerard Mongeau, OMI, DD of the Archdiocese of Cotabato.

They were with the first four daring missionaries who landed in Manila, Philippines in 1939. They pioneered the OMI missionary adventures in the provinces of Cotabato and Sulu, considered the most difficult areas in the Philippines. The country, then was faced with poverty and shortage of priests and mission partners.

Seventeen years later, on November 10, 1956, the OND has come into existence in the Church as a response to the crying need for a community of women that could complement the role of priests and for a community that could understand its own people.

Today, the Oblates of Notre Dame is at the threshold of its 50 years of missionary presence in the Church. It has more than 200 professed sisters.

They are on missionary engagements in the Philippines

MINDANAO

Archdiocese of Cotabato

Archdiocese of Davao

Archdiocese of Zamboanga

Diocese of Kidapawan,North Cotabato Province

Diocese of Marbel, South Cotabato

Prelature of Isabela de Basilan, Basilan

Apostolic Vicariate of Jolo and Tawi-Tawi

VISAYAS

Archdiocese of Cebu

Archdiocese of Palo, Leyte

LUZON

Diocese of Cubao

Diocese of Caloocan

Diocese Malolos

FOREIGN MISSION

Archdiocese of Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea

Diocese of Daru-Kiunga

Archdiocese of San Antonio, Texas, USA

Archdiocese of San Angelo, Texas, USA

The OND Sisters carry out Pastoral Catechesis (primary apostolate) and social services (secondary apostolate) through their varied ministries.

- Pastoral Catechesis

Parish and Diocesan Ministry School Ministry Retreat Ministry

- Social Service Ministry

Justice and Peace Interfaith Dialogue & Culture of Peace

- Reconciliation Center
- Child Peace Learning Center
- Migrants & Itinerant People
- Dialogue of Life, action and religions particularly with Moro Communities
- Indigenous Peoples
- Alternative Education
- Promotion of Indigenous People’s Right
- Advocacy

Masalipit

Hi. Can you please tell me where you got the information on the previous article from? Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 21:29, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bual Sur

Bual Sur is a barangay located in Midsayap, North Cotabato. It is one of the pioneering barrios in Cotabato as it was one of the first settlements of migrants from Visayas wanting to adventure the island of Mindanao.

The barangay is mainly dependent to agriculture specifically rice and vegetable production. Bual Sur is an adjacent of the poblacion area of Midsayap, therefore it has the potential of growth in terms of population as manifested by the influx of new residents preferring to have permanent home here.

Salunayan

Salunayan is one of the biggest and most populated barangays of Midsayap in North Cotabato. It is a thriving place of agriculture as it produces large bulk of rice as well as vegetables supplied in Midsayap and nearby municipalities.

Salunayan has been settled by mostly Ilocano migrants from Luzon such as the Fernandezes, Dumlaos. There is also a significant number of Ilonggo and Cebuano residents. But of course, there is a presence of Muslim (Maguindanaon) staying here as they, after all, are the natives of this place. Presently, the demographics of Salunayan is well distributed in terms of cultural origins since it hosts to military camps due to its proximity to Muslim secessionist infested areas of Midsayap. Soldiers bringing in there families from all over the Philippines chose to stay for good in Salunayan.

The barangay is bordered by Agriculture and Central Glad in the North, Nes and Mudseng in the east,Malingao in the west and Tumbras in the south.

It has a complete public high school and elementary. It has a spacious plaza for social and sports activities. Plus, it has a concrete barangay hall, health center and activity hall.

Records shows that Salunayan produced notable personalities. The present Roman Catholic bishop of the Diocese of Kalookan in Metro Manila and former bishop of the Diocese of Iba in Zambales claimed to have Salunayan as his place of birth and Salunayan Elementary School as to where he finished his elementary education.

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Central Glad, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bual Norte

The article Bual Norte has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced since May 2009

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 03:16, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rangeban

The article Rangeban has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established, unsourced as well.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 05:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rangeban

I have nominated Rangeban, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangeban. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Eeekster (talk) 05:13, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of San Pedro Hospital

A tag has been placed on San Pedro Hospital requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 08:44, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oblates of Notre Dame

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Oblates of Notre Dame, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.omiphil.org/ond_sisters.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:30, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with DZWT

Hello. Concerning your contribution, DZWT, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.catholicmedianetwork.org/radio/BAGUIOMVH.htm. As a copyright violation, DZWT appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. DZWT has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:DZWT and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:DZWT with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:DZWT.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 19:42, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DYEH 729 kHz

A tag has been placed on DYEH 729 kHz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MaenK.A._Talk 08:17, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of St. Ezekiel Moreno Dormitory

A tag has been placed on St. Ezekiel Moreno Dormitory requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chzz ► 13:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

I have reverted your edits to Apostolic vicariate: they were not helpful, and in some cases turned blue links into red links. Thank you. Dr Aaij (talk) 05:08, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sisters Presentation of Mary

A tag has been placed on Sisters Presentation of Mary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 13:48, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeanne LeBer

The article Jeanne LeBer has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Didace Pelletier

The article Didace Pelletier has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rosalie Cadron-Jetté

The article Rosalie Cadron-Jetté has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:35, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marcelle Mallet

The article Marcelle Mallet has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:38, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please ignore the four deletion notices above. The new biography policy only applies to living persons. However, you should supply references for these articles so the information can be verified. This should be done soon. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 03:42, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Rosalie Cadron-Jetté

I have nominated Rosalie Cadron-Jetté, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosalie Cadron-Jetté. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Raa G gio (talk) 04:39, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Jeanne LeBer

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Jeanne LeBer, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.magnificat.ca/cal/engl/10-12.htm and http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/Archive/Alt/alt.religion.christian/2009-10/msg00022.html, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Jeanne LeBer and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Jeanne LeBer, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jeanne LeBer with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Jeanne LeBer. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Jeanne LeBer saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Cassandra 73 (talk) 11:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Oblates of Notre Dame Sisters

Hello Psvillasoto2006, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, Oblates of Notre Dame Sisters, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Kigali1. This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Kigali1. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Kigali1 (talk · contribs) 11:04, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright block

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to quote non-free text. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While investigating the copyright listing for Jeanne LeBer, I have discovered that Little Sisters of the Holy Family, created on 9 April 2010, and Gabriel Taborin College of Davao Foundation, Inc., created on 13 April 2010, are also violations of our copyright policy. So was Marcelle Mallet, which has now been deleted. At this juncture, it seems it is necessary for us to review others of your contributions for problems. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:33, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contributor copyright investigation

The investigation is now open at Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/Psvillasoto2006. In the course of the investigation, volunteers will look at these edits to ensure that they have not placed copyrighted content onto Wikipedia. Contributors are asked to review carefully to ensure that material is not removed by mistake, but unfortunately sometimes we must err on the side of caution. You should review Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations#Responding to a CCI case and particularly note that you will need to keep an eye on the investigation page if you wish to know where problems are located. Your help rewriting content that must be removed would be welcome, once your block has expired, but please be sure that you take the opportunity to review our copyright policies so that you will know how to do so without encountering further difficulties. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 00:50, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabriel Taborin College of Davao Foundation, Inc.

A tag has been placed on Gabriel Taborin College of Davao Foundation, Inc., requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Der Ausländer: Was willst du mir sagen? 00:44, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The same with Little Sisters of the Holy Family. Der Ausländer: Was willst du mir sagen? 01:28, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Marie-Rosalie Cadron-Jetté

Hey! You might remember on April 8, 2010, you created this article. Well, it's been through quite a lot since then, it's now B-class, and I'm hoping to nominate it for Good Article status within the week. If you would like to come and help improve the article for the nomination (particularly with a view to making it fully compliant with WP:MOS), your input would be most welcome. - DustFormsWords (talk) 06:37, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DWIN

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of DWIN, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://en.wikipilipinas.org/index.php?title=Eagle_Broadcasting_Corporation.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Teresian Daughters of Mary, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page TDM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DXMM for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DXMM is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DXMM until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 00:43, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gabriel Taborin Technical School Foundation, Inc. for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriel Taborin Technical School Foundation, Inc. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriel Taborin Technical School Foundation, Inc. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — ⚞ ℛogueScholar 🐈 ₨🗩 ⚟ 03:36, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Central Bulanan, Cotabato

The article Central Bulanan, Cotabato has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy WP:GNG. Unsourced stub. Been in CAT:NN for almost 12 years.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 19:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Seminario de San Jose

The article Seminario de San Jose has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-Notable organization. Cannot find reliable sources from Google, Scholar, News, and Books. Common hits found are for business profile and location listings. Also expect to get false positives as there seems to be a similarly named seminary in Castile.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lenticel ^(talk) 03:37, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]