User talk:Pssk1988

File permission problem with File:Amrita University Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Amrita University Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nidhi Razdan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The interview follows the event of UK government giving an invite to [[[Narendra Modi]], Chief Minister of Gujarat, India. [[Narendra Modi]] was invited to give a speech

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Nidhi Razdan. Thank you. ‑Ugog Nizdast (talk) 09:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that you are continuing to put poor quality content into this article. I suggest you stop. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3: Can you explain me more, how the content written is a "poor" quality? What is your definition of poor quality? I have not written anything from the back of my mind. All the content is written based on facts and are well cited. I am slightly disappointed that things are perceived on a personal basis. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pssk1988 (talk • contribs)

As I said in my edit summary, Not clear what the controversy is or why this needs an entire section. Your text did not say what the controversy was, except to claim that there was a controversy. You should also read WP:CRITS and adhere to it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:28, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]