User talk:PsiEpsilon

December 2011

Hi and welcome to Wikipedia. Your recent edits on the Sandbox have been reverted, as they appear to be a misuse of the sandbox (ie. adding CSD templates to the page). Please read the instructions and rules of the Sandbox carefully, before you make edits to it again. Thank you, -- -- MST☆R ^{(Merry Christmas!)} 07:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, PsiEpsilon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- MST☆R ^{(Merry Christmas!)} 08:01, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with your edits

There are multiple problems with this recent edit of yours:

It is essential that you use edit summaries, especially for significant changes such as proposeing an article for deletion.
The article was already proposed for deletion once, and it is not allowed to use PROD twice on the same article
When you propose an article for deletion, you should add a message about it to the talk pages of significant past editors of the same article, so that they can become aware of the prod in time to contest it.
You did not provide a valid reason for the deletion,

Please do better in future. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about it. Then how do I find out if a page has previously been suggested to be deleted?PsiEpsilon (talk) 06:08, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exterior algebra

Hi, I've noticed that you keep changing part of exterior algebra from the Euclidean plane to C². I've mentioned on the discussion page that the section makes no sense over the complex: it is essential that it be real. Sławomir Biały (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bradyon.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 16:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

Proposed deletion of Properties of Bradyons

The article Properties of Bradyons has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The content of this article is already part of Massive particle, which is itself a stub. Why not improve that one instead?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. RockMagnetist (talk) 06:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Properties of Bradyons AfD

Hello, just letting you know that I submitted Properties of Bradyons to AfD for deletion. The article makes a very good point about the distinction between massive particles and bradyons if tachyons do exist, but its content is too specific to warrant an article, and so I merged the content to Massive particle. I also reverted your change to the Bradyon redirect: Massive particle's original name was Bradyon, hence the redirect. You might want to be careful in the future about editing redirects. Feel free to comment in the article's AfD discussion page. -Anagogist (talk) 21:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Psi Epsilon

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Psi Epsilon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 11:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You people are all in a gang.

Speedy deletion nomination of Psi Epsilon

A tag has been placed on Psi Epsilon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 06:11, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

And so have youPsiEpsilon (talk) 04:02, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Please revoke talk page access. Thank you. Ryan Vesey 14:27, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bradyon concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bradyon, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:23, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Bradyon

Hello PsiEpsilon. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Bradyon.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bradyon}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:02, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]