User talk:PseudoAnon
This is my talk page.
List of Japanese female porn stars
[edit]Hi, PseudoAnon. You might want to read the discussion and add your input on the proposed deletion of the List of Japanese female porn stars here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_Japanese_female_porn_stars
Maybe I'm reading too much into it, but I think comments like, "I swear, Wikipedia is one of the best porn directories on the web right now" in the discussion indicate that an intent to censor is behind the nomination. If red links and verification were really the issue, that could be cleared up easily. Instead, the article was immediately nominated for deletion. -- Dekkappai 07:31, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- I already added a comment opposing deletion. I would add another one, but I don't think it would help. :-) Keep up the good work on the article though - maybe it will help people see its value. PseudoAnon 07:47, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
You said: "Hello. You marked this image for deletion and commented "Removed image with no fair-use rationale". However, I think Template: Magazinecover used on the image description page made it quite clear why the image was acceptable fair use. I added the rationale to the image page as well. One more thing: I asked for clarification at Template talk:Magazinecover. Of course I didn't mean it as a personal attack on you."
- I responded on Template talk:Magazinecover. Thanks for letting me know, I didn't take it as a personal attack and please don't take my response as a personal attack on you. :) --Yamla 14:14, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
- All right. I understand your argument, but it seems that at the very least no consensus exists for deleting some of the images you tagged. PseudoAnon 06:49, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image:Swank June 2004.jpeg
[edit]A tag has been placed on Image:Swank June 2004.jpeg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD i6.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Blue-EyesGold Dragon 08:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:High Society 042004.jpeg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:High Society 042004.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? NoVomit (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2008 (UTC)