User talk:Prunk/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Prunk. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Janko Prunk
Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Janko Prunk may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. --Eleassar my talk 22:42, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Janko.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Janko.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.
Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 17:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Can you provide references for your info on the other claimants to the discovery of Otzi? I did a cursory search, but didn't turn up much. Can you help?--Cúchullain t/c 21:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Help needed!
Kranjska klobasa recipie allows some salt – which? Sodium chloride (table salt) or some nitrate salt (for conservation)? Rursus 07:20, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
The right salt is Sodium chloride (table salt). Prunk 17:05, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Thanx! I'll take a look. Rursus 19:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Verified. Thanx again! Rursus 19:13, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:COI concerns
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
- and you must always:
- avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, attribution, and autobiography.
For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. RJASE1 Talk 13:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello, User:Prunk! I understand that Janko Prunk is the article about your father. There are a couple of things you might perhaps help with, if you know the information:
- I understand that J.P. has written some books in English. Is is possible you have their details?
- We are interested in any third-party commentary about him, especially if it's written in English and it appeared in a reliable source. Do you know of any? (I believe that French or German language publications about him would also be of interest, since some en.wiki readers speak those languages). Even book reviews in major languages would be of interest.
- Because of all the COI rules, it would be best if you could put the info on the article's Talk page and then another editor will move it to the article.
Thanks, EdJohnston 13:02, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Hello User:EdJohnston !
1. There were over 10 books listed on en.wikipedia, which my father wrote, but just recently User:Athaenara deleted all of them. Maybe he will fix the article or I might ask some third party to do that in a proper format.
2. Since my father is mostly presented in Slovenian media, I don't have any internet resources from abroad about him, you might get some information using the www.google.com searching machine.
3. I will do that in the future, to avoid further deletion of the article entries.
Kind regards, Prunk 14:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hello Jan! After our conversation I posted this followup at the conflict of interest noticeboard. EdJohnston 20:42, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
To User:Prunk: It would be helpful if you would participate in the discussion of the Janko Prunk article on the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard. Thank you. — Athænara ✉ 21:23, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Please cite sources
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Magdalena Mohar Jarc, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please find and add a reliable citation to your recent edit so we can verify your work. Uncited information may be removed at any time. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! Can't sleep, clown will eat me 06:43, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Unblock
Prunk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
All the open ports mentioned are ports forwarded for my shell servers. 22,23,443,521,823,921,2022 are telnet and ssh ports. None of those is an open http port..
Decline reason:
Not blocked directly, scanning for open proxy. — Yamla 20:27, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Prunk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 213.157.253.172 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
openproxy
- Blocking administrator: MichaelBillington (talk • blocks)
Decline reason: There are a suspicious number of ports open on this machine, including 22, 23, 221, 443, 521, 813, 822, 823, 921, 1005, and 2022. If you can please explain why these ports are open and provide reason to believe that there is no threat of abuse, please re-request an unblock-auto and we will reconsider. To other admins, if the user gives sufficient reason to believe this machine is secure, specifically noting why these ports are open, please feel free to override this decline. — Yamla 20:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Daniel Vangarde, by Just64helpin, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Daniel Vangarde fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Daniel Vangarde, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Daniel Vangarde itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:48, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Založba Grad
A tag has been placed on Založba Grad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Malcolmxl5 01:15, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Center (Ljubljana)
A tag has been placed on Center (Ljubljana) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. © regua [ talk | contribs ] 14:27, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Tacheles
A tag has been placed on Tacheles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. © regua [ talk | contribs ] 14:33, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Ljubljanski potniški promet
A tag has been placed on Ljubljanski potniški promet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. © regua [ talk | contribs ] 14:39, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
The Ljubljana articles
Hey Prunk,
Please consider making your articles a little bit longer, more referenced and showing the importance of the subject clearly. Otherwise, they all might get deleted in a short time.
© regua [ talk | contribs ] 14:40, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Free Shell provider with network programs ?
Can you give a example of another free provider which allows nmap ? --84.195.241.5 (talk) 15:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
I am not in position to discuss this sort of things with you to promote shell providers, as you would have to subscribe to many different shell providers by yourself (why don't you try them out and see results). I can just say that there are some which allow that sort of programs, you have a good comparison table made on Jan's list for example. Prunk (talk) 07:40, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Založba Grad
A tag has been placed on Založba Grad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shootthedevgru (talk) 12:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Založba Grad
A tag has been placed on Založba Grad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Shootthedevgru (talk) 23:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Unixclan
The article Unixclan has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Grandstream
A tag has been placed on Grandstream requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Collectonian (talk) 04:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
zh:Davos
why did you delete the zh interwiki? Momet (talk) 17:26, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- it was proposed so on the discussion page, could you please check it, I don't speak Chinese. Prunk (talk) 19:30, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- I checked it with babelfish. I know that the automated translations are not perfect, but it gives you at least an idea. Here is (part) of what it translated:
Davos (German, French: Davos; Italian: Tavate; Roman assorted language: Tavau) is east Switzerland's cities, subordinates the Grough bindon state. in December, 2003 population was 10,998 people. By winter sports and every year in there convention world economic forum well-known [...] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Momet (talk • contribs) 06:26, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Notability of Nick Holder
A tag has been placed on Nick Holder requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 10:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Nick Holder
An article that you have been involved in editing, Nick Holder, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Holder. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 11:30, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
I've done what I can with this article - I think it should be safe - he passes WP:MUSIC by way of releases, international touring, and the Essesntial Mix on BBC Radio 1. Regards.--Michig (talk) 20:34, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions about User:Prunk. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |