User talk:Proudtobeindian007

Harikela

Hi, could you explain why did you revert my change to Harikela? Many articles do have infoboxes, but they are for summing up important information. On Harikela, there is no information in the “infobox”, so I don't think it should be there. User<Svick>.Talk(); 18:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Dewan357 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you are not a sock puppet, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SpacemanSpiff 18:03, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Proudtobeindian007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why have I been blocked? All the edits I have made are fine. I fail to understand why they are reversed.

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed sock. TN X Man 18:22, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Proudtobeindian007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All the edits I made to wikipedia is to improve it. I had no choice but to create socks. If I am given a change to get unblocked with restrictions such as banned for a year or two would be better then indefinite block. Is it possible my case can be sent to the arbitration committee and be given extended years of ban instead of indefinite. I believe all my edits are in good faith. User:KWW has a personal vendetta against me. He even reversed me in discussion page [1]. Take me to the arbitration committee and give me several years of ban instead of indefinite. It productive for all of us. Thank you (Proudtobeindian007 (talk) 18:34, 22 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Decline reason:

You had choice, it's called properly appealing your block. None of this excuses the creation of dozens of accounts. If you wish to appeal to the arbitration committee, email them (address is at WP:AC). Be aware that their decision will be final, and that by doing so you lose the ability to appeal further here. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 18:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How does the process work? I want to make sure that I am given couple of years off, but the indefinite block be lifted. Can any administrator help me? (Proudtobeindian007 (talk) 18:44, 22 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

I don't have a special vendetta against you: I treat you like any other block-evading editor: I block every access I can find that you have and undo every edit you make. That's policy, and it's what I do. You know the e-mail address, and it can be found at WP:AC#Ban Appeals Subcommittee. You've contacted them before, and the problem the previous time was that you lied and told them that you hadn't been socking for 6 months when I had just blocked some of your accounts a few days before. There's essentially no chance of you being unblocked in less than 6 months from today, given that you have been so persistent in attempting to evade your block. It's taken hours for several editors to clean up after the mess you have made, and that doesn't make anyone feel very inclined to be lenient. Go away for a year or so, and you will probably be allowed back. If you never go all the way away, you will probably never be permitted to return as an editor in good standing.—Kww(talk) 19:12, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the mess? I made good and fair edits. I will not edit wikipedia until 22 August 2012. Since you said: you don't have a vendetta against me, I will come to your talk page to ask for unblock then. Until then cheers. (Proudtobeindian007 (talk) 19:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]