User talk:Protolock

Protolock, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Protolock! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Protolock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

what the hell happened,who is redbranch

Decline reason:

Confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. —DoRD (talk) 17:56, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Protolock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

confirmed what,i can have more than one account if i want,,whats going on here--Protolock (talk) 02:14, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Funny how these "totally unrelated; I don't who that other guy is" accounts always manage to write unblock requests that sound suspiciously similar. I think I can revoke talk page access here on the same ground. G'bye. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not if you're evading a block, playing a game of good-cop-bad-cop, or trying to double-!vote in a discussion. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 02:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]