User talk:ProtektYaNeck

Hi ProtektYaNeck.

If you see something that's pure vandalism, completely incomprehensible, is a direct copyright violation, or meets any other of the Criteria for Speedy Deletion, you can add the template {{Speedy deletion|reason}} to the top of the page, subsituting the word "reason" for whatever criterion you feel it meets. One of the admins monitoring "Speedy" requests will then take care of it. It's also courteous to leave a note on the contributor's talk page to let them know what happened.

Oh - and by the way - welcome to Wikipedia! :) --Rlandmann (talk) 23:23, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. ProtektYaNeck (talk) 16:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome

Your very welcome my friend, but I very strongly agree with what you written in that Glock page, and honestly it was my pleasure to fight the 'elitest' attitudes of some editors here who believe only because something has been on here earlier, it is automatically more accurate. I quickly checked the sources you provided and they seem much more reliable than the very little they have given. And in my opinion, the whole 'Introduced' section is irrelivant, as it is the PoV of people in the US only. The gun has been in production and circualtion wasy before that date. I also started a new section there about whan the gun was in Service, because it says it's been designed, produced and put in service all in the same year - 1980. :) Take Care bro, Sinan. Pink Princess (talk) 00:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're Welcome

Operation COOKIE MONSTER