User talk:ProtectionTaggingBot

Welcome trial automation! John Vandenberg ^(chat) 01:48, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss at Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ProtectionTaggingBot#Discussion. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 02:58, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edward VIII

hey John...just curious. I have see that this article was protected by a bot. ProtectionTaggingBot. May I ask why? This article is on my watchlist as it's the only one that I have been able to make a quasi-substantial edit to. I don't see any real controversy on the talk page and the article has been stable for a while (as far as a newbie can tell). So I am just seeking enlightenment. Tide rolls (talk) 05:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The bot does not protect articles, it adds the protection template to already protected articles. "Edward VIII of the United Kingdom" was indef semi-protected since August 12 by User:NawlinWiki. If you don't think it should be protected you can talk with the protecting admin or request unprotection on WP:RFPP. BJ^Talk 06:11, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've unprotected it. John Vandenberg ^(chat) 06:21, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your explanation, BJ....I should've read the main user page. I see my mistake now. Still learning. Tide rolls (talk) 07:57, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Icons for move protection

No doubt I have missed a discussion on this topic somewhere, but is there really a need to add the icon to pages that are "move" protected only. It seems a little forbidding to have the lock sitting on a page that is indeed open to everyone to edit. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 04:35, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it has, but there was no real outcome. The pages are being tagged with {{pp-move-indef}} which redirects {{pp-move-vandalism}}. If it is agreed the icon should be removed it is a simple change. BJ^Talk 04:47, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 08:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MZMcBride went ahead and removed it already. BJ^Talk 08:20, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could the bot change the instances of {{pp-move-vandalism}} in {{pp-move-indef}} ? There are much more cases where the latter should be used, then we could change back individually. Cenarium (Talk) 00:35, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also you needn't to add |small=yes for {{pp-move-indef}} since the template has no output by default. Cenarium (Talk) 19:01, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken care of most of the needed changes from {{pp-move-vandalism}} to {{pp-move-indef}}. You needn't use your bot for that. I've updated the template {{pp-semi}} so that it categorizes depending on the namespace. So it should be fine to use the bot in Portal, Help, File, Wikipedia space and non-user talk space. Cenarium (Talk) 04:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You may also add {{pp-move-indef}} to the above-mentioned namespaces, I've updated it to categorize based on namespace. Cenarium (Talk) 23:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move=autoconfirmed

The bot has added a move-protection template to a page with "move=autoconfirmed" level, [1]. This is a mediawiki bug, but could the bot check if it's move-protected with autoconfirmed level, and avoid tagging ? Cenarium (Talk) 17:35, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It also added the template mistakenly here. Cenarium (Talk) 22:08, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note also Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)#move.3Dautoconfirmed. Cenarium (Talk) 00:36, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stoicism

Eh? I don't see where it got that expiry date from... --MZMcBride (talk) 11:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have the same question.[2][3] John Vandenberg ^(chat) 05:23, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]