User talk:Proscriptus

--328cia (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Welcome![reply]

Hello, Proscriptus, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Infrogmation (talk) 20:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Xenophon Huddy

For discussion of the Xenophon Huddy article

Gus Monckmeier

For discussion of the Gus Monckmeier article

Kirkland Island

For discussion of the Kirkland Island project

Rosario Scalero

For discussion of the Rosario Scalero project

Goertz and 507

Contrary to my first impression, I´m now convinced you´re willing to contribute good faith edits. Still, I´d ask you to back your claims up with sources. If Goertz was a count or not is a matter of legal circumstances (I´m not an expert on this); if his middle name was Zeppo is a matter of disputation, apparently; if Standard Catalogs are reliable or not is a matter of dispute; changing a citation-backed date (like the 507`s end of production) without deleting the quote is a sign of sloppy working. Your habit of not citing anything is not a good one, that´s for sure. Your habit of not adding a signature on talk pages is annoying. Altogether, the impression that you leave on regular contributors is that of the typical egotistic loud-mouth know-it-all, although in real life you´re most certainly a very agreeable person. Just think about it, if you please. --- I´ll consult a Gotha next week and try to find out anything on Goertz` middle name. A good day to you, --328cia (talk) 22:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My "habit of not citing" only occurs when the articles I'm writing haven't yet been published, you putz. If I said it without a citation, then it came from a primary source, in this case the owner of a 1960 BMW 507 which I photographed, drove, researched and wrote about, who also owns the single most complete collection of original 507 materials in the world, including BMW. When the article's published--and it's sitting in an editor's hands right now--then I'll cite my own damn work.

There's no dispute among anyone who writes about or researches old cars about the accuracy of Standard Catalogs. They're as full of holes as Ron Paul's economic policy. The rule of thumb is, if it's in there, it's wrong.

I bow my head to you, the modern-day automotive Michelangelo or P.J. O`Rourke. And you´ll damned need an editor, for sure. --- You may drive, photograph and research as much as you like, on WP you are still condemned to back up your claims. What do you think the authors of the 503/507 book I quoted did for research? Reading tea leaves? --- I´m tired of wasting my time with your ilk; your primary sources are, in the final analysis, apparently nothing but hearsay, and your self-aggrandizing stance is utterly disgusting. --- Still waiting for something that backs up your contentions that Goertz was not a Count and that his second name was Zeppo. --- And if you want to have a tasteless show-down: I´ve done 26 car books in the last 10 years. Putz, vulgo --328cia (talk) 00:56, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I´m very curious as to your reaction to the fact that BMW themselves say that the last 507 was built in Dec, 1959. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 328cia (talk • contribs) 02:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here it is again, for your convenience:

According to a further source I dug up (Georg Seeliger: BMW 503/507, Motorbuch Verlag, Stuttgart 1993), I can confirm the Waldorf Astoria presentation. The same source lists year-by-year production figures: 1955:3; 1956: 13; 1957: 91; 1958: 98; 1959: 48; 1960: 0 (although four registrations are listed for 1960; on page 138 you can read (my translation): "Production of the BMW 507 ended after a total of 209 Series II cars. 63 of these were built in 1957, 98 in 1958 and 48 in 1959. In the same years, a total of 41 Roadsters were registered in Germany. Later build years (1960 or even 1961) refer exclusively to the date of first registration; not one 507 was built after December, of 1959. Car No. 254, the car with the highest official number, was finished on August 14, 1959. Three more cars, that had been worked upon for months, left the factory at a still later date: No. 70.236 on December 29, 1959 and before that No. 70.242 on November 2 and 70.244 on November 4."

BMW acknowledge in their own archives that the last 507 was built in December 1959. Now, what you`re making of this?? --328cia (talk) 07:31, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ridding your talk page of unwelcome entries is another proof of your bad judgment and certainly not allowed by WP laws. -- A buddy of mine looked up Goertz in several reference works, and wouldn´t you know, he was listed as a Count and as a not-Zeppo. I´ll back that up some time with a quote, and you won´t be able to do anything against it, although for knowledgable eyes, you´ve disqualified yourself long ago. And by the way, threatening to quote your own unsourced work as a source alone disqualifies you for any serious work. -- 328cia (talk) 20:31, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, you have GOT to relax. You do realize you're talking about a car, right? I'm pretty sure no-one's life is at stake here. And I'm pretty sure that P.J. O'Rourke is the modern-day P.J. O'Rourke. (Proscriptus (talk) 18:25, 11 August 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks for the advice (seriously). I sure did relax by backing down and leaving WP, and I´ve been the better for it ever since, that´s for sure. In hindsight, I do apologize for my harsh words, of course. -- Still, I´d beg you not to prefer oral sources to written ones; and if my buddy who looked it up will ever find his notices again, I`ll insert Goertz`s full name in the article. Here`s to you, --328cia (talk) 03:08, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate that. On my part, I'll hold myself to a higher standard--check out my new entry on Kirkland Island.Proscriptus (talk) 13:57, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mick Farren

The following is in reference to the automated removal of a link to Mick Farren's Doc 40 blog from the Mick Farren page. This is surely an appropriate external link to the page, however. Proscriptus (talk) 14:15, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mick Farren has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bblog(?:cu|fa|harbor|mybrain|post|savy|spot|townhall)?\.com\b' (link(s): http://doc40.blogspot.com/) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 14:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Motor_Age_cover_1912.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Motor_Age_cover_1912.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 00:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll attempt to do so; I find the process confusing. In short, this is material published in the U.S. 97 years ago, which I believe puts it in the public domain. Proscriptus (talk) 12:01, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Gus Monckmeier

On October 14, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gus Monckmeier, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page _{(here's how)} and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

≈ Chamal ^talk ¤ 03:39, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eori, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LLC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, that solver is a great tool. Fixed! Proscriptus (talk) 17:37, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Original score for the song Dream a Little Dream of Me.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Original score for the song Dream a Little Dream of Me.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:14, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Milton Adolphus score for "Dream a Little Dream"

Hi; hope I'm not bothering. Just wanted to ask if you still had that scan of the handwritten score found in the Nickerson archives; I can't seem to find it anywhere online, now. It's driving me nuts. :-S Thanks, in advance. Stolengood (talk) 22:52, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Proscriptus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]