User talk:Promoteme

Welcome!

Hello, Promoteme, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Maddy Lewis, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! OlYeller^Talktome 14:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maddy Lewis

The article Maddy Lewis has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. OlYeller^Talktome 14:46, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Maddy Lewis. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. OlYeller^Talktome 16:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maddy Lewis, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. OlYeller^Talktome 17:01, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maddy Lewis, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. OlYeller^Talktome 17:31, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk

Hello, Promoteme. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Help_desk.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Chzz ► 11:03, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References on Maddy Lewis

Promoteme, it seems that several of your references and claims made in the article are flat out false. I've opened a discussion on the article's talk page to let you explain these references that you've added. I highly suggest you respond as adding references in the way that you have is highly frowned upon. Please reply as soon as possible. If no response is given, I may nominate the article for deletion and suggest that you be blocked from editing for a period of time. OlYeller^Talktome 17:37, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Maddy Lewis Production 2011....jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Maddy Lewis Production 2011....jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Maddy Lewis Production 2011....jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Maddy Lewis Production 2011....jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Maddy Lewis Production 2011....jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Maddy Lewis Production 2011....jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maddy Lewis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maddy Lewis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maddy Lewis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 18:31, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} All I can suggest as editor of Maddy Lewis page is that physical materials supporting this page is sent to Wikipedia which I can obtain by writing to Maddy Lewis. I appreciate that mistakes have been made editing this page and grateful for the help given at Wikipedia. However, Maddy Lewis production still picture I tried to replace with the only image I had placed there previously that was cleared. I noticed that the articles about proposed deletion express that people can get very angry with responses to proposed deletion however, I would not get angry with the Wikipedia staff as I have found editing this page the Wiki staff members to be very helpful. If you could let me know what what be best to do next Promoteme (talk) 11:23, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We don't use physical stuff mailed to some third party by the subject of the article. We require that content of articles be sourced to verifiable published content from reliable sources. If nothing of subtance has been published about her, then Q.E.D.! --Orange Mike | Talk 21:17, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]