User talk:Prometheus14

Prometheus14, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Prometheus14! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

May 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of German inventions and discoveries, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 23:49, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please read Teddy bear. If you wish to mention the simultaneous development by a Russian inventor, please get his name right: Morris Michtom. General Ization ^Talk 23:52, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of German inventions and discoveries, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 00:41, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at List of German inventions and discoveries. General Ization ^Talk 23:25, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Besa machine gun, you may be blocked from editing. Denniss (talk) 13:46, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Electric car, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dennis Bratland (talk) 17:40, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 17:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Europefan.

Matches Europefan's M.O. in many ways; not worth an SPI yet but worth noting. Dennis Bratland (talk) 18:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Thank you; I was thinking that myself. The only thing missing is accusations of British and American nationalism directed toward other editors. This editor also has a lot (maybe more) in common with MORNINGSIDE. General Ization ^Talk 18:26, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what the problem is? All I did was add inventions to the countries that invented them. You call that disruptive? I put these inventions into their respective national origins. (Tractors, pickup-trucks, minivans, etc. All invented in America) but for some strange reason you all have to take them down, even though they are American inventions???? A simple Google search would show all these things were created in the United States. And I put Jet airliners, gliders, etc. As British inventions (which they are) but for some reason you don't think they should be classed as such??? Do not understand you people, it's as if you all want to diminish american & or British contributions. I did also add one French invention which was the blimp/airship but no it isn't good enough to be classified as an invention? Everything I put was accurate regardless if I did it out of nationalistic void. So I don't get why you also had to take em down as if it isn't true. Prometheus14 (talk) 21:27, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to understand other editors' point of view on a particular item, then open a discussion on the article talk page, make your case there, and take time out to think over their replies. It's no good edit warring with them and imagining it will get you anywhere. Just a piece of advice from an old stager who happens to be drifting by. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 20:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Harrier Jump Jet. BilCat (talk) 20:31, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. BilCat (talk) 03:26, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, you are edit warring at Glider (aircraft) and you are not giving any explanation, even in your edit comments. This behaviour is disruptive and if you persist, you will probably get blocked again. If you wish to avoid this, may I suggest that you do two things:

Add a short comment in the Edit summary field below the main editing panel before you save each edit.
If challenged (i.e. reverted, then start a discussion on the article talk page (to open the talk page, click the Talk tab just above the main article display).

I have just done the second of these at Talk:Glider (aircraft)#A British invention?. I invite you now to contribute to that discussion and make collaborative contact with those editors who have been disagreeing with you. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:59, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]