User talk:Prolineserver

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! —The-thing (Talk) (Stuff I did) 12:20, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Papas & The Mamas

On 4-June, you started the nomination process for deletion of this redirect. However, you did not complete the nomination by listing it at WP:RFD. I have removed the deletion nomination. If you want to re-nominate it, please follow all the steps at WP:RFD. I would note, however, that redirects like this one are usually kept. You may wish to check the reasons for deleting & keeping redirects at that page before proceeding. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 13:20, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Four Pulleys

An image uploaded by you has been promoted to featured picture status

Your image, Image:Four pulleys.svg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! MER-C 11:47, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

POTD

Hi Prolineserver,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Four pulleys.svg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on October 17, 2008. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2008-10-17. howcheng {chat} 23:57, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alfred Nobels will-November 25th, 1895.jpg

A file you have uploaded/edited (File:Alfred Nobels will-November 25th, 1895.jpg) have been changed a bit by me. The Author of the work is Nobel and not you even if you might have taken the photo. You don't happen to have a source for the image? --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 14:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, according to Swedish law (Article 49a) also reproductions of 2D objects in public domain are copyrighted for 50 years, this e.g. makes it impossible to upload reproductions made in books. To the source: I made the photo two years ago from the original during a press conference at the Nobel-foundation (the Nobel-museum just contains a copy), as i did also with File:Michael Sohlman-press conference at Nobel foundation.jpg (left/behind of Sohlman is the famous painting of Nobel which iirc was deleted from Commons for this reason). --Prolineserver (talk) 19:00, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Am I right in thinking it isn't actually a PD work and that this change reflects the actual status of a (potentially copyrightable) photographic reproduction released by you? Rambo's Revenge (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you want I just release my part as PD, I don't want to support a stupid swedish copyright regulation. --Prolineserver (talk) 20:55, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Miroslav Lajčák

I modified the description of the image of Miroslav Lajčák you used on that article. It was not an official portrait. It seems likely that it was intended in a slanderous way as the photo makes him look half-asleep while working. Hopefully this was just a language misunderstanding but if not, please do not include false information in Wikipedia. Jason Quinn (talk) 18:06, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did not add the caption, just the image, see here. I didn't recognize that there was an old image caption in the template. --Prolineserver (talk) 20:48, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct. I made a mistake. Actually, now it's a matter of figuring how how to fix the problem since the template is making assumptions that aren't always valid. Apologizes... it's all just in the name of making the encyclopedia better. Cheers. Jason Quinn (talk) 03:12, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, its a chain of small mistakes: First the problem arised when removing the old image not completely, then when I didn't check the preview carefully since I didn't expect a caption to appear, and later when a user was shifting the images and did not recognize the stupid description. May be a warning should appear if there is a caption without an image, or the page is autocategorized in a maintance category in this case. I don't know how often this happens and how important this issue is. --Prolineserver (talk) 14:40, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost

Hi Prolineserver, habe deinen Blogbeitrag für den Signpost verwurstet: Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2010-08-02/News_and_notes#Wikimedians accredited as photographers at royal wedding

Regards, HaeB (talk) 07:57, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, danke! --Prolineserver (talk) 20:24, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dracorex says thanks!

	E-Volunteer survey star contributor
	A message of thanks from The Children's Museum of Indianapolis' star dinosaur, Dracorex, for contributing your opinion in our E-Volunteer survey. Thanks for your time. You're the best! LoriLee (talk) 19:59, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you're interested, here are some more ways you can help. Either way, your opinion's valued! Thanks! LoriLee (talk) 20:32, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bulk upload of images from Open Access journals

Hi Prolineserver,

as briefly mentioned at WikiCon, I am interested in bulk uploading suitably licensed images from OA sources. A test case is currently being discussed here, and some input from the technical side would be helpful. Thanks! -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 19:24, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot-jobs

Hi,

Good to meet you at GLAMCamp. You may recall my lightning talk on microformats. There's an outstanding BOTREQ to fix dates in microformats; is that something you could help with, please? There's also a current request relating to album/ song durations. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:40, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm sorry to tell you that I'm not a pywikipedia-programmer at all, and I have too many other projects going on. --Prolineserver (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I was misinformed. Thanks anyway. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:58, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

POTD notification

Hi Holger,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Royal Wedding Stockholm 2010-Slottsbacken-05 edit.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 19, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-06-19. —howcheng {chat} 17:14, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Prolineserver. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Prolineserver. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]