User talk:ProgGR

This user loves yiff, and is probably a furry.

December 2016

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Analogstats (talk) 00:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at The Young Turks.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. . Analogstats (talk) 20:09, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Sro23. I noticed that you recently removed some content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Sro23 (talk) 12:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at The Young Turks. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 12:06, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cenk_Uygur. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MorbidEntree - _{(Talk to me! (っ◕‿◕)っ♥)}^(Contribs)(please reply using {{ping}}) 05:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Cenk Uygur, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 06:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave edit summaries

Otherwise, nobody will understand why you made the edit. And, it starts to look like vandalism. You can add "see talk page" Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 06:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request page protection

See wp:RFPP#Current requests for increase in protection level and add to the bottom of the list. Usually a "Semi-protection:" is what is warranted. Briefly explain why. Feel free to copy from other requests. Jim1138 (talk) 06:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Cenk

Hi Cenk / Ana, how are you doing? 213.205.194.91 (talk) 19:57, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]