User talk:Professortimithy

Professor Timithy is a professor emeritus at Exeter. Often attacked by amateurish Wikipedia users because of his work in human rights and anti-terrorism, Timithy is a leader in reformed education, peace, and diplomacy.

Professor Clarence TimithyProfessortimithy (talk) 12:17, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Global Peace Process

Professor Timithy, in concert with esteemed colleagues in the field, has collaborated to devise an active plan for global peace. Over the next 20 weeks The Global Peace Project will implement renewed efforts to put forth a Global Peace Process, that will hopefully face minimal resistance by the mostly pro-rape and anti-freedom community.

August 2014

I understand that I am not being censored. I am simply being unilaterally disabled from presenting facts that do not conform with the social philosophy and message of the Wikipedia administrators and editors. The ACLU defines censorship as follows:

What Is Censorship? (2006 resource): Censorship, the suppression of words, images, or ideas that are "offensive," happens whenever some people succeed in imposing their personal political or moral values on others. Censorship can be carried out by the government as well as private pressure groups.

Since I have also been branded as "Clearly not here to contribute to building the encyclopedia" it seems only sensible to reverse every horrible, useless contribution I've made over the past 5+ years, whether I've consented to them becoming public or not.

Then I request to either be unblocked/uncensored or have my account and all my 200+ contributions deleted. Also your term "edit war" is totally subjective. Like I said, I did exactly what you wanted and you blocked me anyway. Professor Clarence TimithyProfessortimithy (talk)

Your words, images and ideas are not suppressed, simply not being promulgated on the website of a private charity. You are free to post your words, images and ideas on your own website, blog, newspaper, podcast, tshirt, bumper sticker or other form of free speech. There is a handy essay here, WP:Alternative outlets. Perhaps your website will be of such quality that millions will turn to it for information. There are quite a few places to start a blog free of charge. Threatening to reverse edits "whether I've consented to them becoming public or not." while blocked is quite likely to result in additional unfavorable scrutiny and definitely not likely to lead to an unblock. - - MrBill3 (talk) 01:59, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access removed. You can email ArbCom if you wish to protest this. You cannot be uncensored since you weren't censored to begin with (if you don't understand that you don't have the competence to edit here). As for your 176 article edits, they cannot be undone, though I note that your work on Toilet seat cover has already been reverted by Kudpung and others. By now you've descended into trolling, and I have nothing more to say to you. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]