User talk:Professionalecho

Hey, let's talk :)

Ways to improve Keyforge: Call of the Archons

Hi, I'm Rosguill. Professionalecho, thanks for creating Keyforge: Call of the Archons!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide more citations for the Gameplay and Development sections. Content that is suspected to be original research runs the risk of being deleted. It also helps establish the subject's notability.

You should also consider replacing the longer quotes in the Development section with paraphrases or summaries to preserve encyclopedic tone

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Rosguill^talk 04:51, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Ollerton (July 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To be considered notable enough for an article, subject must have significant coverage in multiple intendent secondary sources, and/or have significant scientific contribution which is provable by how often their work is cited by others.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Ollerton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jeff Ollerton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Professionalecho! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nightenbelle (talk) 18:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Penny Dreadfuls.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Penny Dreadfuls.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]