User talk:Processone

The Order published has been superseded by the High Court ruling of 3rd July 2019; the article currently published is out of date and irrelevant. Additionally Mr Justice Garrett Simons specifically requested it not to be published on any website. It would be a breach of Court rules to publish this Order on a public forum. Therefore it is suggested that the author/publisher contact Ms Justice Marie Baker for clarification on this matterProcessone (talk) 14:07, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Goold v Collins and Ors. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Please comment on deletion of the article in relevant deletion discussion page. NJD-DE (talk) 14:18, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Hello, Processone, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Privacy Check (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:19, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]