User talk:Prlaud

".... it is difficult to determine exactly where they inhabit because of their similarity with the P. alcon.[3] They are thought to be concentrated in the Alps and in Southern Europe." would read better as ".... It is difficult to precisely pinpoint their habitat because of their similarity with P. alcon."Prlaud (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References 12,13 are the same, a link to a website by an individual. A reference that is a published article from a journal would generally be preferred. Can you look into this?Prlaud (talk) 17:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple statements are supported by the same reference, and the said reference is listed multiple times in the Reference list. It should be listed only once, and the multiple statements in the article itself that it supports should have the same reference number. See your reference number 4 in the Reference list at the end for an example, each different statement that it supports in the body of the article is marked by an alphabet placeholder next to the reference number 4 in the List of References at the end.Prlaud (talk) 17:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good article review

Phengaris rebeli, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Sasata (talk) 15:24, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]