User talk:PrivateThoughts

February 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to AR-15 has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 22:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AR-15

You can complain about "bullying" all you want, but you are topic-banned and yet you edited the article: this is grounds for a block. TParis, this user needs to hear some words of wisdom from someone they might possibly listen to. Drmies (talk) 02:03, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to guess you can't "topic ban" me based on an arbitration case in which my name didn't appear and was about a different article. I'll also note that you don't seem to have read any of my actual contributions, or the talk page itself. PrivateThoughts (talk) 02:37, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What makes you think it takes an abcom case especially for you to get topic banned? Niteshift36 (talk) 02:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violating your topic ban from AR-15. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 03:01, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PrivateThoughts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you look at my actual contributions to the web page, they consist of making grammatical corrections and making the article less biased. For this work, I got trolled by a number of users, including Niteshift3. My latest set of edits, which consisted of wording fixes to a poorly written paragraph. Drmies, who applied the topic block, has never read my contributions or apparently looked carefully at the talk page. I invite anyone to look at my changes to the AR-15 article and point to anything that's been negative.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; the block has already expired. That said, the ways of appealing the topic ban were listed in the messages you were left on your talk page which you removed. Ignoring the topic ban and editing the article you are banned from regardless is a bad idea and will see you blocked, with escalating block lengths. Huon (talk) 14:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To PrivateThoughts and the reviewing admin: please note that this is an arbitration enforcement block, see WP:AEBLOCK. Bishonen | talk 03:28, 24 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]

I reverted you once, mainly because the material (which had already been removed once before) didn't appear helpful. And I said that in the edit summary. That edit was made after your topic ban. I've been active on that talk page for days.... but somehow my single revert is "trolling you". Whatever. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:06, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]