User talk:PristinePlum

PristinePlum, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PristinePlum! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Your edits to Mike Adriano

Hello. Your changes to Mike Adriano have been reverted. You have repeatedly changed the subject's birth date, contradicting the cited source. If you have better information, please WP:CITE a better source. As for removing the official website, please note that WP:Wikipedia is not censored. • Gene93k (talk) 00:23, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

CUPIDICAE💕 22:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify, your edits to the Hinnant shooting are the issue here as you are giving undue weight to original research which is unsupported (and discussed on the talk page) by the current sources and the body of the article. CUPIDICAE💕 22:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Your recent editing history at Shooting of Cannon Hinnant shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. CUPIDICAE💕 22:53, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:PristinePlum reported by User:Praxidicae (Result: ). Thank you. CUPIDICAE💕 22:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Shooting of Cannon Hinnant. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]