User talk:Prismsplay

Welcome!

Hello, Prismsplay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 17:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. DreamGuy (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prismsplay (talk) 13:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC) Prismsplay is an historian who contributes accurate information about subjects of interest to other students of those subjects. Prismsplay does not edit anything on Wikipedia for personal benefit. The only organization that Prismsplay strives to benefit is the Human Race that we are all a part of.[reply]

Sherlock Holmes

Personal websites are not acceptable sources. Do not re-add this site, or others like it, again. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 01:40, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prismsplay (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC) As an aging member of the Human Race, Prismsplay is well aware that people like to promote their own interests. Prismsplay's contributions, or attempted contributions, to Wikipedia's article on Sherlock Holmes have fallen into two categories:[reply]

1. correcting false information placed there by persons with personal agendas.

2. granting access to information concerning the publication dates of the original Sherlock Holmes stories. The reason that that information was not incorporated into the text of the article, which would be perfectly legitimate, since it is indisputable facts, is because it would require considerable time and effort to add a table that someone could in less than ten seconds remove. Prismsplay decided that the better approach was to link to his page with that information, a page, it should be acknowledged, that promotes nothing other than presenting a table of indisputable information.

The suppression of truthful information is a sin against the Human Race that we are all a part of. I was under the impression that Wikipedia is organized to make truthful information available and not to suppress it.

Please read WP:SPS. We cannot accept this link because we cannot verify the contents, per Wikipedia:Reliable sources. If you continue to re-add this link without discussion, you may face being blocked for edit warring, a form of disruptive editing. Please begin a discussion thread on the Sherlock Holmes talk page. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 14:13, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Josephine Earp may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

//www.angelfire.com/ks/landzastanza/ggk.html 1914 "Kaloma" valse hesitante by "Gire Goulineaux" (pseudonym of Johann C. Schmid (1970-1951)] sheet music and MIDI sequence

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Prismsplay. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Prismsplay. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]