User talk:PriscusDeCockWORLDWIDE

Welcome

Hello PriscusDeCockWORLDWIDE and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your contributions, such as the ones to Unstone, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox (but beware that the contents of the sandbox are deleted frequently) rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a Help desk, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Help pages
Tutorial
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing?

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! — Newslinger talk 21:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Unstone. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 21:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PriscusDeCockWORLDWIDE! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Dronfield several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Dronfield, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 21:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:71F0 (talk) 21:29, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Obscene for adding Gary Cahill to a Wikipedia on the sports section of where he is from! Come out from behind your hidden identity eh! PriscusDeCockWORLDWIDE (talk) 21:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! PriscusDeCockWORLDWIDE, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — Newslinger talk 21:25, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Help against attacks!

Currently under assault for nothing really ! Power trips! Any moral editor please help calling for assistance ! PriscusDeCockWORLDWIDE (talk) 21:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced edit -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:51, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unsourced edit -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PriscusDeCockWORLDWIDE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

NOT REALLY SURE WHY IVE BEEN BLOCKED PELASE CAN THE EVIDENCE OF SEVERE ABUSES BE PROVIDED!

Decline reason:

Claiming you are so incompetent that you can't tell why you've been blocked won't work out for you. Yamla (talk) 21:52, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed to MasterCockLicker123. --Yamla (talk) 21:53, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:53, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]