User talk:Princessriyaahuja

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Princessriyaahuja. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Author Prachi Gupta, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:55, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chris,

I'm not personally linked to the article person in any way.

I'm a reader who likes to read Indian fiction. I just joined Wikipedia to start editing and contributing articles about authors.

I'm not paid and asked for the license of images from the author. She replied when I asked her.

And if you see the content, I have not promoted anything or wrote any promotional content regarding her.

I'm just learning to post good articles on authors I recently start reading.

Thanks,

Riya Princessriyaahuja (talk) 22:08, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That seems odd because you claim File:Author Prachi Gupta.jpg is yours and you release it CC-SA. That's not the same as obtaining permission for a photo via WP:OTRS. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:11, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I choose the wrong option then. I will change it. I'm new. Still learning.

Please guide me more so that I dont make a mistake next time. Princessriyaahuja (talk) 22:17, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the source of the image and they are public and license free. I have also asked permission.

What else I need to edit?

I would like to learn as I want to be a good editor. Princessriyaahuja (talk) 22:39, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will draft a response to you on Commons later, but you cannot just download photos you found online, claim them as yours, and release them. That's theft and copyright violation. The upload guide gives you clear choices in this regard. I would suggest requesting deletion of those photos on Commons now. Chris Troutman (talk) 22:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prachi Gupta (November 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

None of the sources is reliable, independent, and secondary. To show notability, the draft must be based on multiple such sources. See this guideline.

Several sources are copies of the same press release. Have a look at this explanation.

Blogspot blogs, Goodreads, and pages hosted at weebly cannot be used as sources. Medium.com should also not be used – and in any case, the medium.com source is one of the identical copies of the "journey of an author" promotional source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prachi Gupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 13:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Princessriyaahuja! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 13:31, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prachi Gupta (December 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NAUTHOR. Additional references from independent and reliable sources are essential to demonstrate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prachi Gupta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 06:20, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Prachi Gupta

Hello, Princessriyaahuja. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prachi Gupta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Prachi Gupta

Hello, Princessriyaahuja. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Prachi Gupta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:14, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]