User talk:Princessrbl

Wikipedia conflict of interest reminder

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rita Jenrette, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:39, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss article issues on its talk page

You have not explained in detail what the issues are with the article as written.

Please explain those on the article talk page: Talk:Rita Jenrette.

We need to understand what statements are false or misleading or libelous.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 05:25, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Three-revert rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rita Jenrette. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:49, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]