User talk:Princesskirsty

Re Jonas Armstrong

Looking at the revert I did to the site, the only thing I can thing why I changed it was #1 - no link to another article and #2 when it comes from an IP numbre instead of a user's name I thought it was vandalism. I over did it with the editing after all it is an odd name. Sorry, if go into history and save the one before my edits the infomation will return. Bluetooth954 00:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Scottish parliament election, 2007

I reverted because the descriptor "Scottish" is unnecessary when referring to a Scottish election. The Conservative Party doesn't use the term "Scottish" in their Scottish election literature, and that should be enough. Similarly, there is no need to add "Scottish" before the Labour Party or the Liberal Democrats, though both have separate branches in Scotland. The Scottish National Party, Scottish Socialist Party and Scottish Green Party, however, use the identifying term "Scottish" in their literature and in their names, and it is thus appropriate to leave "Scottish" there. The proper use is always what the party uses colloquially rather than the official name; yes, the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party exists as an entity within the Conservative Party (UK), but their literature never uses "Scottish" (which is, when used in literature, is generally a trademark of the nationalist parties, the SNP, SSP and Scottish Greens). —Cuiviénen 21:10, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Election literature - pamphlets and whatnot, as well as campaign websites. —Cuiviénen 13:57, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Antonycotton.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Antonycotton.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Quentin X 18:15, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moved Comments

Thank you very much! Yes, am frustrated with the childish amount of vandalism on the Dima Bilan page. Many thanks for your comments. InternationalHit2 21:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments! Another page that is vandalised almost daily is Mawi. There seems to be a vendetta against this poor singer! I just cleaned it up today again. InternationalHit2 16:38, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- leave me messages here rather than my userpage plz

Harrylloyd.jpg

I have tagged Image:Harrylloyd.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Rette tast 15:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory Michael

It's sometimes hard for someone not involved to determine who copied whom. Sometimes Internet Archive dates are helpful with determining priority but not always. Generally I have found that Wikipedia copies IMDB much more often than the reverse, so this is unusual. Anyway I just flag possible copyright violations when I encounter them, I have no stake in the matter. Quatloo 23:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've cross my complaint off the copyvio page and remove the notice. Since I am the submitter, this is certainly OK. Quatloo 23:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Joearmstrong.jpg

I have tagged Image:Joearmstrong.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 04:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar Mockery

On May 7th of this year, at 14:37, the user page User:Dr Spam (MD) was created. Within a period of 48 hours, User:Dr Spam (MD) had placed approximately 55 barnstars on user pages and user talk pages. Many recipients doubted the sincerity of the sentiments behind these barnstars, in part because of the comments placed by Dr Spam on the barnstars. A sampling of the reasons that Dr. Spam offered for presenting barnstars to editors:

Hi - I am putting this here in case there's trouble later. Please accept this tireless barnstar thing for all of your wiki-activity. Thanks. User:Dr Spam (MD) 16:08, 11 May 2007

nice one! User:Dr Spam (MD) 16:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am leaving you with this barnstar for you to reflect carefully on. I will provide the citation in a few days once you have had the opportunity to consider why I might think that you deserve it. Peace User:Dr Spam (MD) 16:50, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done for all of your fantastic editing / writing: you are obviously a genius of our day, shining like the brightest barnstar against a dark barnnight in these new and difficult wiki-times. I therefore award you the surreal barnstar (I can't get the other barnstars to work properly - my apologies.) Please note that you have no right to remove the barnstar, for it is sacred. LEAVE WELL ALONE! Many thanks.

awesome contribution to this web site! have a lovely barnstar thing User:Dr Spam (MD) 12:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

cool editing

Awesome

Cool.

I am awarding you a surreal barnstar because you obviously deserve it! Keep up the good work - don't slacken off, it'll get harder before it gets easier!

Hy my cat (the fat white one) is awarding you this barnstar of diligence because he doesn't eat fish either. He just likes to eat biscuits - or so he says. But how then does he get so fat????

Occasionally Dr. Spam's comments did appear sincere (if vague), but a review of the record indicates that sincere-appearing comments were generally generated during a massive cut-and-paste session. There were also many barnstars presented with no comments at all, and even more that User:Dr Spam (MD) presented without signing his name to indicate from whom the award was coming.

In response, once this pattern of apparent insincerity was established, a few experienced editors asked Dr. Spam to desist from barnstar spamming, in the belief that randomly awarding barnstars devalues the entire barnstar program. (Indeed, so random was the placement of barnstars, that some were even placed on wiki accounts that had not been active for over a year.) Dr. Spam has now stopped, presumably recognizing that his efforts were not appreciated by the majority of editors.

Most of the barnstars placed by Dr. Spam during his May campaign have been voluntarily removed by the editors on whose pages they were placed. You are receiving this notice because Dr. Spam's barnstar still remains on your page. If you feel that Dr. Spam's barnstar spamming was a form of mockery, you may choose to remove it yourself. But if the way this barnstar was "awarded" does not bother you, you are of course free to keep it on your page. After all, it is your page. This notification was simply for your information. HuskyHuskie 13:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hunnam.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hunnam.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell ^babelfish 02:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

Regarding your question on the help desk. The article looks okay, but to be considered referenced, you need to put the links that back up the article content in a separate references section instead of just including them with the external links. Of course, you can use official websites in both sections, though their use should be kept to a minimum in the references section because they're not independant sources. Browse the templates we've got and see if there is one that says existing references need to get a proper formatting job. If you can point out what is backed up by what, I can help you with the formatting. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Monkeybusinessdvds.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Monkeybusinessdvds.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nicholas nickleby film poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicholas nickleby film poster.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 12:14, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gregory Michael

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the Gregory Michael article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. AirOdyssey (Talk) 03:16, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Monkeyworld.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Monkeyworld.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:42, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland

I'm just dropping you a quick note about a new Wikipedian in Residence job that's opened up at the National Library of Scotland. There're more details at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scotland#Wikimedian in Residence at the National Library of Scotland. Richard Symonds (WMUK) (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]