User talk:Princess lily

Hello, and Welcome to the Wikipedia, Princess lily! Thanks for the contributions to the Lasse Virén article. Here are a few perfunctory tips to hasten your acculturation into the Wikipedia experience:

Take a look at the New contributors' help page, the Wikipedia Tutorial and the Manual of Style, and If you still need any help, you can always post your question at the Help Desk.
When you have time, please peruse The five pillars of Wikipedia and Assume good faith, but please keep in mind the unique style you brought to the Wiki!
Always be mindful of striving for NPOV, be respectful of others' POV, and remember your perspective on the meaning of neutrality is invaluable!
Explore, be bold in editing, and, above all else, have fun!

And some odds and ends: Cite your sources, Civility, Conflict resolution, How to edit a page, How to write a great article, Pages needing attention, Peer review, Policy Library, Verifiability, Village pump, and Wikiquette; also, you can sign your name on any page by typing four tildes: ~~~~. Best of luck, Princess lily, and most importantly, have fun! Ombudsman 06:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Juha Väätäinen

Where in the world did you get the impression that Juha Väätäinen's surname is spelled "Väatäinen"? It is spelled with a double ä in Finnish, and in languages that respect the original Finnish spelling, or without any diacritics if the writer insists that he knows the spelling of his language better. The original Finnish article backs me up on this. Finnish does not use an "äa" combination anywhere. The only place where you would see it would be in compound words, where it would be "ä" followed by "a", not a combination vowel. JIP | Talk 12:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

World Cup

Hi there. It is no trouble to ask. I removed the table due to other editors recently questioning it. All articles here at wikipedia have an associated "talk" page (confusingly called discussion on the tabs at the top). In the world cup talk page, Talk:FIFA World Cup a couple editors there have suggested it shouldn't be there as it is "original research", what that means in effect is that it isn't encyclopaedic work, but newly created ideas by yourself. If the historical rankings table is something which fifa or some other official body has produced then it will be fine and it can go back in, but if it is just something you have created then it isn't really ok. The other issue that the editors raised about it on the talk page was that you were using 3 points for a win - that obviously isn't historically accurate. You are welcome to post your thoughts and reasons why you think the table should be included on the world cup talk page - some discussion might be generated and a compromise might be reached, but for the moment I removed it just to be on the safe side. Best wishes, SFC9394 20:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]