User talk:PrimroseGuy
|
Holy Crykey! That's ALOT of references! And I thought I had nothing better to do. Great job, keep it up! - CobaltBlueTony 16:42, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
Unencyclopedic Diebold articles
[edit]I've proposed some of your articles dealing with Diebold product lines for deletion. I feel strongly that they are unencyclopedic; I care about keeping Wikipedia useful, and I think that these articles are a step in the direction of "a collection of random information" (a la WP:NOT, WP:5P). If there is special significance to these product lines (to someone not as intimately involved in the industry as you appear to be) they should stay, but the articles appear to be mere listings of products and technical data. - PatrickFisher 00:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Disambiguation Talk Request
[edit]This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 22:11, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Speech synthesis up for FAR
[edit]Hi there,
You're listed in the edit history of this article. I wonder whether you're able to help bring it up to FA standard again? Please see WP:FAR#Speech_synthesis.
Tony 06:54, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thematic vowel
[edit]Hi,
It's not a huge deal, but I'd ask that you be careful when disambiguating links — linking to the wrong page is generally worse than linking to a disambiguation page. (I bring this up because of your recent edit at Subjunctive mood, where you mistakenly disambiguated Thematic to Theme (linguistics), which is about a completely different topic. The correct topic is Thematic vowel/Vowel stem.)
Again, not a big deal, but you might want to keep it in mind. :-)
—RuakhTALK 16:48, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
The Classics
[edit]Thanks for your disambig. of Classic/Classicism, re stained glass
--Amandajm 14:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Place name redirects
[edit]Hi, I noticed that you've redirected Rhostyllen to Wrexham, along with a number of others. I'm not sure that this is really a good idea, especially when redirecting to a county article (eg. Rhodes Minnis to Kent) as it doesn't really make sense to be directed to an article on a completely different topic, just because it happens to be in vaguely the same geographical area. I rather agree with User:Ruakh above that no redirect would be better than a misleading one. If the redlink is left, then it's easier for another editor (especially a new editor) to create a new article at the redlink in the future, rather than having to break the redirect first. Cheers, DWaterson 16:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Can I add my support to DWaterson's request? I've just started on Cumbria's villages to discover you have created similar redirects that make it appear that an article exists when it merely points to the county or district - not very helpful to enquirers or other editors. Best Wishes Saga City 16:49, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Christmas-themed listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Christmas-themed. Since you had some involvement with the Christmas-themed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Christmas-theme listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Christmas-theme. Since you had some involvement with the Christmas-theme redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Christmas theme listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Christmas theme. Since you had some involvement with the Christmas theme redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:05, 16 November 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Willow Green
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Willow Green requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Crouch, Swale (talk) 14:14, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Willow Green listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Willow Green. Since you had some involvement with the Willow Green redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Rhoden Green listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rhoden Green. Since you had some involvement with the Rhoden Green redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Ystrad-ffyn listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ystrad-ffyn. Since you had some involvement with the Ystrad-ffyn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Rhyd-lydan listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rhyd-lydan. Since you had some involvement with the Rhyd-lydan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:51, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Rhireavach listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rhireavach. Since you had some involvement with the Rhireavach redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:27, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Rhives listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rhives. Since you had some involvement with the Rhives redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:50, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Windsole listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Windsole. Since you had some involvement with the Windsole redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Ythsie listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ythsie. Since you had some involvement with the Ythsie redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:37, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
Festive-themed listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Festive-themed. Since you had some involvement with the Festive-themed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:24, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Theme (arts) for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theme (arts) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.