User talk:Primogen

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 30 days are automatically archived to User talk:Primogen/Archive/Archive 01. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

Welcome!

Hello Primogen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Francs 2000 00:29, 31 December 2005 (UTC) (Current Prince of Milton Keynes, UK ;-p)[reply]

userbox

Could I borrow the codeing for your Twilight Zone user box? - wikimindless

heroes

thanks for the edit, I was about to revert it, I just saw the web comic (a little bit of sources would be fine though, I'll try adding something like that when I get enough experience in the wiki :D)

AfD nomination of Better Halves

An editor has nominated Better Halves, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Halves and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:No Mouth Box Front.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:No Mouth Box Front.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 16:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NBC Sports Heads-Up Poker

The article NBC Sports Heads-Up Poker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no primary sources on this phone app, and even the developer is not notable judging by the red link it currently shows.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ArcAngel (talk) ) 05:49, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Win Lose or Draw.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Win Lose or Draw.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:19, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gayne Rescher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:56, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

flagicons and linking nationality in infoboxes

Per Template:Infobox person and WP:OVERLINK, there is no reason to be using flag icons or linking to nationality in infoboxes. There is no reason to believe that when some is described as being from the United States that anyone would need to do additional research by reading the article about the country. Alansohn (talk) 18:12, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I saw a flag icon in another info box, but now I understand that it is not be be used. Primogen (talk) 21:08, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

J. J. Abrams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Director

James Goldstone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Shaftsbury

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

People associated with comic book films

FYI: I understand that when you added the {{WikiProject Comics}} banner to people associated with Marvel Comics films, it was done in good faith. But the Comic book films task force is part of {{WikiProject Film}}, which already covers so many articles, that it was decided (not by me) to exclude actors, filmmakers and screenwriters. These people are covered by the filmbio work group in {{WikiProject Biography}}, and unless they are also comics creators, they should not be added to the comics project. Fortdj33 (talk) 18:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harold Livingston

Hello, Primogen. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Harold Livingston, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Harold Livingston to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 21:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfC

This is a neutral request for comment as a participant in a past discussion regarding a similar topic at Talk:The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug#Critical reaction and WEIGHT. Thank you.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 15:37, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vampire: The Masquerade – Bloodlines

Hi Primogen, a long shot as you haven't edited in a year, but you made this edit on Vampire the Masquerade Bloodlines in 2006, adding a lot of behind the scenes development information. I have worked on developing the article significantly recently but am unable to source much of this info such as :

When Troika had not completed a playable Santa Monica hub with combat and discipline usage that met Activision's satisfaction after more than two years of development time, the publisher took several steps to bring closure to the troubled project. First, Activision increased the budget to add Troika's second development team to the project in March 2004, after they had completed work on The Temple of Elemental Evil. Next, it sent the game's Activision producer and two testers to work on-site at Troika's offices until the game was completed. Finally, it set a hard deadline of September 15 for Troika to produce a Code Release Candidate. Troika delivered the Code Release Candidate on the required date, although not without taking a toll on the development team, as comments found in the game's files suggest: "#TJP: SEPT 15th I'm drunk. Hasn't this game shipped yet?" Due to the game's size and complexity, the Code Release Candidate took three weeks to test, but on on October 4, 2004, Bloodlines went Gold as Version 1.0. Since contractual obligations with Valve would not allow Bloodlines to be released before Valve's debut of the Source engine in Half-Life 2, Activision did not publicly announce that the game had gone Gold and instead gave Troika an additional week to polish the game, after which Bloodlines Version 1.1 underwent another three weeks of testing. It was this second version of Bloodlines that shipped on November 16, 2004 -- the same day that Half-Life 2 was released.

I was wondering if you could tell me where you got this info so that I could better source it, as otherwise the information would need to be removed and it would be a shame to lose useful information. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 22:02, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Primogen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Robert Sallin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert Sallin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Sallin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:55, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Murray Golden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murray Golden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murray Golden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NBC Sports Figure Skating

The article NBC Sports Figure Skating has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability, only sources I could find was an IGN review and 2 brief articles announcing the NBC sports range of games from Abandon Mobile, not significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 13:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NBC Sports Real Golf

The article NBC Sports Real Golf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of notability, only sources I was able to find was an IGN review, E3 coverage from Pocket Gamer that discusses it a bit, and 2 brief articles announcing the range of NBC Sports games by Abandon Mobile

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 13:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Electric Transit (software company)

The article Electric Transit (software company) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

lack of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Waxworker (talk) 23:11, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest editing

Hi. I'm an administrator on Wikipedia. I wanted to drop a note on your talk page about editing articles with which you have a conflict of interest. Ideally, you should post to the article's talk page and request edits using {{request edit}}, though you're certainly free to correct hoaxes or vandalism. Assuming you really are who you claim to be (you never really know who you're talking to on the internet), it would be be big benefit to Wikipedia if you could contribute some of your knowledge of the video game industry. Just be careful about adding adjectives and adverbs to articles about you or your business interests. It's difficult to do so while maintaining a neutral point of view. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]