User talk:Prewitt81

Re: Patrolling

Sorry im new.

Thomas Secunda

Hi,

I've put a note on this page regarding the CSD ... perhaps more appropriate in this case just to stubbify?

MackSalmon 08:57, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Righto - CSD removed. Good work, though! MackSalmon 09:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re Hugh Hallihan

Well, looking at the section, there doesn't seem to be any criteria for inclusion, as far as I can tell. So I don't see a particular reason to remove it, just perhaps make POV. As for the link, it can be removed. seresin | wasn't he just...? 20:42, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

larry king death error

By the way, there was no need to post that vandalism notice. I made the edits in good faith, I just made a mistake, you could have read everything on the talk page.

Thank you75.118.140.159 (talk) 05:10, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note to readers: Check out her/his editing history and decide what you think! :) --Prewitt81 (talk) 05:14, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what happened to "assume good faith" my friend?75.118.140.159 (talk) 05:18, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The level 2 warning, which you immediately blanked, makes no faith assumption. --Prewitt81 (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

other than assuming the edit is vandalizing that is...

Thanks75.118.140.159 (talk) 05:46, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From User Warnings, you'll see that a vandalism warning can assume good faith, make no assumption, or assume bad faith. This really isn't a big deal. --Prewitt81 (talk) 05:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well, thank goodness for that!! Cheers friend!!!!!!75.118.140.159 (talk) 06:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Democracy of information

Hi. I'm not sure what happened, but it looks like there is no template {{DeleteVote}}, which you used at this debate. For readability, I removed the redlinked template name from your !vote and replaced it with an * and Delete, which is consistent with your comment. Please feel free to amend or revert me as you wish. Thanks! UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 13:19, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that after I left the note - apparently, boatloads of people were using it, and now there are redlinks all over the debates. Good times! Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 01:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edmonson County High

Thank you sir, for looking over the Edmonson County High School article.

OPMaster (talk) 23:37, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thompson submachine gun?

I did not edit or vandalize the article "Thompson Submachine Gun." I just got this message today, even though it said it was from March 2008. I just started on Wikipedia about a month ago, and I have never even read the article you mentioned in the message. I hope you understand. if so, thank you. -StaleCupcakes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.151.87.58 (talk) 19:16, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]