User talk:Prettybeautifulnailsalon

Welcome!

Hello, Prettybeautifulnailsalon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Siawase (talk) 10:49, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Edge of Glory

It's the album's third single and no matter how you try to rephrase it, you cannot go against what reliable sources say.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Writing "According to a casting notice that E! News got their paws on, Gaga is looking for a hot dude to make out with in the video. Specifically, the notice asks for a "Puerto Rican or Dominican type badass" who "must be willing to kiss Lady Gaga ... Think Enrique Iglesias. In addition to the hot guy, the casting call also is seeking "Couture Doctors" who will wear smocks and black gloves, adding "think 'Dr. 90210'." Other roles include a "male or female on-air reporter" and a group of military men to hold M16 rifles" is completely unprofessional the way you wrote that. Do not make any more changes or edits. It borders on vandalism. calvin999 (talk) 17:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to The Edge of Glory. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:06, 29 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kellylayitonmeofficialsingle.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kellylayitonmeofficialsingle.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Countdown

Just because you added a description to the picture, it doesn't necessarily make it notable. The picture itself was not notable. Calvin • ^NaNaNaC'mon! 12:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marymylifeiijourneyact.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marymylifeiijourneyact.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Marymylifeii.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Marymylifeii.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:24, 6 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

Hello, Prettybeautifulnailsalon. You have new messages at Jivesh boodhun's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Criminal

Perez Hilton is not a reliable source either. You need to stop this. Xwomanizerx (talk) 05:20, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Criminal (Britney Spears song). Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 05:44, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Criminal (Britney Spears song). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Xwomanizerx (talk) 19:24, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicki Minaj Moment 4 Lifej single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicki Minaj Moment 4 Lifej single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prettybeautifulnailsalon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

So, it was just another seemingly normal day, i log into my wikipedia account, and i shockingly find out that i've been blocked by a user named Kww, he's accusing me of sock pupettry; i am shocked, this is my one and only account, and i would never ever even think of making more than one account, kww must have me mistaken with someone else.

Decline reason:

Judging by the evidence below, no reason to unblock. Alexandria (talk) 17:29, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Passing by admin: talking to blocking admin at the moment Alexandria (talk) 16:41, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User's fascination with Lindsay Lohan, idiosyncratic edit summaries, editing of two articles that were recreated shortly after beind deleted as creations of another blocked Brexx sock (Sundays at Tiffany's (film) and Marry Me (2010 film)). It's Brexx. No real room for doubt.—Kww(talk) 17:15, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]