Jump to content

User talk:Preshprosh12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Preshprosh12, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Vacancy Records, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Vacancy Records

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Vacancy Records, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Preshprosh12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Vacancy Records gave me permission to use their logo and can provide evidence if needed. Took it of there website and facebook page....I am Not paid Jimfbleak nor did i design the logo. also Barrie-James ONeill page has been taken down. Please put back up as.

Decline reason:

So, you lied when you said the logo was your own work and you were the copyright owner? That's deeply disturbing, you placed the entire project in jeopardy. Additionally, your contributions were completely inappropriate. They might be okay on a marketing site but have no place in an encyclopedia. Yamla (talk) 12:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Preshprosh12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

As i said i got permission to use the logo. I apologies if i put i own copyright. But if thats the only thing stopping the page go up then delete the logo. Like ive said i am a fan ive not been paid. I can provide any evidence needed. Can you please put back up Barrie-James page as its i never created that page. I only updated his info. Preshprosh12 (talk) 12:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can't prove a negative. I don't think companies hand out logos to fans. 331dot (talk) 23:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Preshprosh12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Can someone please put back up Barrie-James O'Neill page Preshprosh12 (talk) 09:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not a reason to unblock. To be unblocked, you will need to:

  • Disclose any connection you may have to Barrie-James O'Neill, to Vacancy Records, or to User:Vacancyrecords1
  • Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked
  • Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:15, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Preshprosh12 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a fan of Barrie-James. I met the guys of Vacancy Records at Barrie's Last show at Oran Mor Glasgow and they were really kind to me and let me meet Barrie. So thought people should know about them. Thats why i created them a wiki page . I understand 100% why i was blocked and i apologies for any inconvenience i caused. In contributions terms i will not upload copyrighted artwork by someone else and will back up everything i write with references. I will also donate to wiki as i love this platform and feel terrible if the Barrie-James wiki page got taken down because of me. Thank you for given me this chance to explain myself Preshprosh12 (talk) 10:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since there is now an SPI, I am declining for now. — Daniel Case (talk) 02:11, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Preshprosh12 (talk) 10:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC) You seem genuinely naïve, and sincere enough that I'm not reflexively declining your request. But ... when you say "Thank you for given me this chance to explain myself", I must point out that this is the fourth chance you've been given to do that. We don't always let people have that many unblock requests before we revoke access to the talk page. So the real question you should be asking yourself is, "do I feel lucky?".[reply]

Also, I'd lose the promise to donate to Wikimedia if someone else decides you should be allowed to edit again. As we explain here, that is a very bad idea. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preshprosh12, please be warned: one more unblock request that fails to address the reasons for your block and what you will do in future to avoid further problems, and you will lose access to this page. If that happens, you will still be able to make unblock requests via email. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:34, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Preshprosh12, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:11, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you did your homework you would see Barrie-James has a big fan base and it’s not just me. So if you honestly think I am creating a lot of accounts to get this page back up your wrong. It’s clear that he is independent of his band Kassidy. He is more knowing than the band yet you still choose to put a redirect on his page. The references that were up are all reliable and also just getting an feature in billboard..His page has been up for years. So the fact you aren’t taken of the redirect just shows your just power mad. Preshprosh12 (talk) 18:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Preshprosh12&oldid=1057347819"