User talk:Precious delicate sweet little baby

Three revert rule and Capitalism

Your recent editing history at Capitalism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Your changes have been reverted by several different editors now, so please discuss your point of view on the talk page. Thank you. BeŻet (talk) 19:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RfC on Socialism

I have now started an RfC to help achieve consensus on the contentious issue. BeŻet (talk) 14:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How nice of you. Precious delicate sweet little baby (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. BeŻet (talk) 18:30, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I'll play that game. Precious delicate sweet little baby (talk) 18:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"No violation"

I've found a tag to insert in the article, to alert readers to the NPOV problem, which saves me the trouble of having to revert. Problem solved. Precious delicate sweet little baby (talk) 22:21, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]