User talk:Prcc27/Archives/2024/July
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Prcc27. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WP:NOTCENSORED and what is means to me
Hello,
I think I understand you spirit of this rule, and I'm 100% fine with this. It's just that I don't see it as an proactive guideline. Sure, stuff can be objectionable to some or even to most, but it doesn't HAVE to be.
To the example of Foreskin restoration, even in my version of the article there where 4 full frontal male genitalia. I only meant to rearrange them so that the most explicit one will become part of the embd:og card when embedding into other site.
To me SFW, means just that Safe For Work. Nothing else. Safe for a random person to see while in a mixed or uncontrolled environment.
Anyway, thanks for all the great work Refael Ackermann (talk) 21:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
2024 campaign issues expansion
Hi Prcc27,
Just want to let you know I agree that the 2024 United States presidential election campaign issues section needs expansion with the Harris campaign's official platform. I am currently waiting until more news articles come out with her campaign's positions as a lot of them are mostly speculation and not official positions or statements she has made regarding her 2024 candidacy. BootsED (talk) 17:30, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Prcc27. I am here to discuss the ECP restriction on the mentioned talk page. My understanding is that it comes from this discussion about applying 1RR with 1RR and ECP applying as Active Arbitration Remedies. However, I do not see any evidence that the ECP remedy has been used on the talk page. My question is if it is intended to apply to those who have not reached 500 edits and if it not being enforced should mean that it should be considered for removal. --Super Goku V (talk) 02:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- The ECP should be automatic. If a user is not autoconfirmed and has less than 500 edits, they are unable to edit the article in question, from my understanding. Prcc27 (talk) 02:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- True that they should be unable to edit the article. My comment was a bit unclear, but I was asking if it is intended to apply to the talk page as well. Based on my understanding from Eurovision Song Contest and with focus on this discussion, that editors with under 500 edits are not permitted to participate in discussion on those talk pages, unless it is to suggest an edit to an article. I will note that discussion at Eurovision 2024 was messy, with multiple ANI discussions and an Arbritaration clarification request, among other things. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think so, but I’m not sure. Prcc27 (talk) 04:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- Gotcha. I am somewhat unsure as well given differences between both talk pages. I guess I will wait and see if it becomes a discussion later on and not worry about it for now. --Super Goku V (talk) 04:29, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think so, but I’m not sure. Prcc27 (talk) 04:19, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- True that they should be unable to edit the article. My comment was a bit unclear, but I was asking if it is intended to apply to the talk page as well. Based on my understanding from Eurovision Song Contest and with focus on this discussion, that editors with under 500 edits are not permitted to participate in discussion on those talk pages, unless it is to suggest an edit to an article. I will note that discussion at Eurovision 2024 was messy, with multiple ANI discussions and an Arbritaration clarification request, among other things. --Super Goku V (talk) 03:57, 29 July 2024 (UTC)