User talk:Prasannakumarbg

Welcome!

Hello, Prasannakumarbg, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Harsha entertainment, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tompop888^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Harsha entertainment

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harsha entertainment requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tompop888^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:40, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Prasannakumarbg! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Masum Ibn Musa ^Conversation 06:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Proposed deletion of Manoranjan Ravichandran

The article Manoranjan Ravichandran has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One new movie. Possibly self-advertisement (picture purportedly uploaded by subject himself). May not meet NFILM

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf^(talk) 10:51, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manoranjan Ravichandran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manoranjan Ravichandran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoranjan Ravichandran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Alexf^(talk) 14:17, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why am I blocked :(

Hello there,

              I seemed to have been blocked stating the below reason.

=== However, the following accounts are Confirmed to each other: Mediabuzz Prasannakumarbg Shanki1107 ===

But, I can confirm and assure I only one username and that is prasannakumarbg and I have no clue of those above two said username, should there be anyone from wikipedia asking for my credentials please mail me on prasannakumarbg at gmail.com and I can provide my confirmation of identity and also prove I have nothing todo with above two username.

Regards, Prasanna Kumar BG

Conflict of interest

Hello, Prasannakumarbg. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Conflict of interest

Hello James,

               Thanks for the reply !

1) avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors
2) propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles
3) disclose your COI when discussing affected articles
4) avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles
5) do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies

On all above points to my best of knowledge I have stuck to the Wikipedia policy and as said just to brief you about myself I am a salaried software professional myself and am a cartoonist and am a passionate kannada movie lover, just that I was really disappointed to see me being blocked for all wrong reasons ! Look am OK if I am continued to be blocked from Wikipedia contributions , am not sure how I need to convince.

Requesting for unblock again !

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Prasannakumarbg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Firstly I was told that i have multiple account so i was blocked and i appealed for it that I have stated that I hold no multiple accounts as the reason stated. Later I was i am given a new reason of block as COI and I have appealed for the same that I am contributor to wikipedia with no momentary benefits and none of the COI applies to me, yet my username continues to be blocked. Hence i am requesting again for userid to be unblocked.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry I cannot unblock you at this time. This is a WP:check user block; please read that section of the WP:GAB pertaining to this type of block. The block relates to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Amitbhb12.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 08:39, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.