Jump to content

User talk:Prakashlyrics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Prakashlyrics, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Yes Michael? •Talk 04:06, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Police Story 3 Kannada Film. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia!

- Happysailor (Talk) 21:04, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Sagar S.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Puffin Let's talk! 13:38, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 13:22, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Ondu Roopayalli Eradu Preethi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 Chzz  ►  00:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm Geniac. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mungaru Male seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 02:23, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. --Geniac (talk) 22:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at S. P. Balasubrahmanyam, you may be blocked from editing. --Geniac (talk) 02:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at S. P. Balasubrahmanyam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 23:58, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Upma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for repeated insertion of unsourced POV puffery. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Geniac (talk) 05:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

[edit]

Stop icon Your addition to Kesari bhath has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — CactusWriter (talk) 15:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Rajesh (Kannada actor), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. As said, per MOS, honorifics are not to be included. In addition to these, you seem to be adding too much of puffery. — Abhishek  Talk 12:38, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SL93 (talk) 10:58, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Prakashlyrics, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!


SPB

[edit]

Hi, the stuff you added is really unwanted in a BLP. SPB might say anything since he is very much popular in all the three territories—Andhra, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu. We cannot add everything mentioned in interviews. There are numerous other things to be added about him. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:04, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

He has sung in all languages and how can what he say not be important. He has mentioned time and again not only to the Kannada media, also to the english media NDTV un his interview that Kannada fans are my first fans. I have not been respected in any part of the country like the way Karnataka respects me. I want to be born as a kannadiga in my next life. He has not said this once. He has said it 'n' num of times and he has not only said it to Kannada media. He has said it to English media too. He also goes on to say that tomrw other media may qstn me for saying this. But I Dont care. This is my stand. So how would this v strong view of his not important for his page. This is a v imp thing amongst the numerous other things that is to be added about him. Thanks Prakashlyrics (talk) 17:24, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

[edit]
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at S. P. Balasubrahmanyam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —Vensatry (Ping me) 17:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Police Story 3 Kannada Film concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Police Story 3 Kannada Film, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kotigobba (Kannada Film).pdf listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kotigobba (Kannada Film).pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. LGA talkedits 21:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sirivantha.pdf listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sirivantha.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. LGA talkedits 21:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Police Story 3 Kannada Film

[edit]

Hello Prakashlyrics. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Police Story 3 Kannada Film.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Police Story 3 Kannada Film}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 23:00, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prakash Raj, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, Tamil and Telugu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Prakashlyrics/sandbox (February 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 23:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nam Life Story (March 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
Kevin Rutherford (talk) 00:40, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Talk:Prakash Raj, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. — Abhishek  Talk 17:17, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nam Life Story concern

[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nam Life Story, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nam Life Story

[edit]

Hello Prakashlyrics. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Nam Life Story".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nam Life Story}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:03, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"legendary"

[edit]

Hello. I have reverted some of your recent edits because they were unsourced and unconstructive. You seem to like using the word "legendary", but I would strongly advise against it. When someone has written 3000 songs, it's impressive enough for the reader. If you then say he is a "legendary" song writer, most certainly the reader will stop believing you. And that will reflect poorly on Wikipedia. Thanks, Biwom (talk) 06:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cinema of Karnataka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Super Star. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Prakashlyrics. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm NOTNOTABLE. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Juhi Chawla seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Specifically: please refrain from using words. Thank you. NOTNOTABLE (talk) 20:27, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Juhi Chawla. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Your statement about the acting school is fine, but none of the statements about "rewriting history books" or "record breaking hits" are sourced. Please source them and rewrite without using WP:PEACOCK terms. NOTNOTABLE (talk) 20:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs as references

[edit]

Hi there, re: these changes per WP:UGC and our reliable sources guidelines, we don't use random websites or blogs as references. Anyone with an internet connection can start a blog or website and posture as an expert on any subject. Often there are unscrupulous site operators who make money by regurgitating inaccurate box office date churned out by film promotional companies. To avoid these problems, the community only cares what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy have to say. That means mainstream newspapers and their online presences, magazines, books, etc. Unless you're prepared to convince the Indian cinema task force that "logicalmoviereviews.com" and "fabnewz.com" are reliable sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking, they should not be used. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Mungaru Male 2. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Diff: [1] Nowhere in this reference does it say Mungaru Male 2 grossed 25 crore. In fact, the article says "Mungaru Male 2 has earned about Rs. 17 crore at the worldwide box office by the end of its second weekend." Your change is indistinguishable from vandalism. Please be sure your future financial changes are consistent with the references you are using. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:56, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Prakashlyrics. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sagar S Music Director 2.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Sagar S Music Director 2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poor quality orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:20, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Prakashlyrics. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for promotion or advertising, as you did at Sagar S. Doug Weller talk 16:06, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sagar S

[edit]
Notice

The article Sagar S has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is a lack of any significant or minor coverage in WP:Reliable sources making this article unverifiable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sagar S Music Director India.jpg

[edit]
Notice

The file File:Sagar S Music Director India.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Sagar S. No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:38, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Prakashlyrics&oldid=1098152115"