User talk:Prague3

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Prague3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 09:07, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rolf h nelson. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Artificial intelligence, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. To be more specific, a source was provided, but it did not appear to meet Wikipedia standards for a reliable source. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 20:22, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Prague3. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. From your edits, it seems very clear you've got a WP:COI with regards to Peter Belohlavek. Please review the pages listed above. Ravensfire (talk) 01:29, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ravensfire! Thank you for your information. From reading the articles you shared with me in my talk page, I confirm I do not have a COI. Thanks to your comments, I created my user page to introduce myself. I participated in Wikipedia creating 3 different articles for which I have been working hard to find sources and followed the guidelines for creating a page, based on the 5 pillars of Wikipedia. I have no personal relationship with the created pages, have not worked for them and do not receive any payment. When I had just created the newest article, a user asked to deorphan it, that is why I connected it to the mentioned page, which I thought was useful for the readers of Wikipedia. I will be paying special attention to the guidelines and protocols for talk pages, which I am now getting familiar with. I am introducing myself in my user page, which I hope you can visit. I appreciate your suggestions. Thank you. Prague3 (talk) 17:33, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Unicist Research Institute for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Unicist Research Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Unicist Research Institute until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:30, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]