User talk:Pradeepkumarxplorer

May 2016

Hello, I'm Barek. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Marijuana (word), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 04:27, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Marijuana (word), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MisterRandomized (talk) 11:14, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Moxy (talk) 11:42, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your post titled The reliable source is my website dhyanayoga.info online for 12 years [1]: Please read and understand the article at WP:Verifiability. Your web site would not be considered a reliable source. The length of time a source has been publishing has no bearing on its reliability. The fact that it is yours means it is a primary source, which are of very little value at Wikipedia. Until you have a reliable source that is not you, please stop adding this material to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willondon (talk • contribs) 13:27, 17 May 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Marijuana (word). --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:50, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice

Your recent editing history at Marijuana (word) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 15:51, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:24, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]