User talk:Prachursharma
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katva until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Specs112 t c 15:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Eve Lawrence, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://clubevelaurence.com/n/?nats=MTQ0LjIuMy4zLjAuMC4wLjAuMA.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 15:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States
[edit]
Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. JoelWhy? talk 17:45, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.
I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.
If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.
The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.
We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 17:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Admin Notice
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JoelWhy? talk 17:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoelWhy? talk 18:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Sharia in the United States for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharia in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharia in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:16, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eve Lawrence
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eve Lawrence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:42, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
[edit]
Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Eve Lawrence. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Fed Chairmen discussion
[edit]Prachursharma, I'm sympathetic to some of your current causes. I think there is plenty of merit for Sharia in the United States, and while I'm dismayed to see Eve Lawrence is probably heading for deletion again, I can't come up with any policy arguments to save her. We disagree regarding Religious affiliations of the Chairmen of the Federal Reserve of the United States, but I still wanted to give you some advice on that AFD. Several editors are arguing that religious affiliation is irrelevant to that position, and that WP:RS don't discuss those chairmen in the context of their religious beliefs. Others are arguing that the article conflates ethnicity and religiosity for the Jews. If you want this article to survive, you need to engage those arguments. You can't just keep bring up other articles that list people by religion. The burden of proof is not on delete voters to prove that similar articles aren't attack pieces. If you genuinely think they are inappropriate for Wikipedia, nominate them for deletion. It's not unreasonable to say that an article which parrots neo-Nazi and anti-Semitic talking points is an attack piece. With a new and controversial article like this, that concern needs to be addressed if the article is going to stay. --BDD (talk) 20:00, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012 (2)
[edit]
This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Religious affiliations of Presidents of the United States. Breawycker (talk to me!) 00:05, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jclemens (talk) 02:25, 26 June 2012 (UTC)Sockpuppetry case
[edit]
|
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Prachursharma for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. LadyofShalott 23:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of The Hidden Wiki for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Hidden Wiki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hidden Wiki (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:28, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Seattle Freeze for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seattle Freeze is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seattle Freeze until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)