User talk:Powerweb

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Powerweb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have only one account please unblock me

Decline reason:

A simple denial is not sufficient in sockpuppetry cases; you will need to specifically address why we think you are a sockpuppet when you are not. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Powerweb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have only one account and dont connect to another account i use wikipedia near 10 years Powerweb (talk) 01:42, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Again, simple denial is not sufficient. You need to explain how your draft was nearly identical to that of another account, if there's no relationship at all between the two accounts. Yamla (talk) 11:49, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop wasting our time. If you are unwilling to post an unblock request which addresses the reason for your block, you will lose access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 14:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Powerweb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I mistakenly copied an article that was edited to start editing and because of ignorance of the rules, please return my articles with my account and delete the copied article, not the entire article and account. Powerweb (talk) 14:14, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per discussion, this is a case of meat puppetry. User is invited to disclose what other accounts with which they have an outside relationship. And to read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID in case they happen to apply. Please read the WP:GAB for further options.-- Deep fried okra

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You mistakenly copied a deleted article?!? How could that even happen? --Yamla (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2019 (UTC) Because I had a close relationship with the owner of the article, I had a copy when it was active --Yamla Powerweb (talk) 14:24, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ha! Okay. That is a violation of WP:MEAT and confirms the block was appropriate. --Yamla (talk) 14:28, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So what should I do? --Yamla Powerweb (talk) 14:31, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Until the original account is unblocked, there's nothing to be done. The block is appropriate. Please tell the owner of the article to stop violating WP:EVADE and WP:SOCK. It wastes our time and yours. --Yamla (talk) 14:32, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I said I was related to the person who wrote the article, not the one who wrote the article. And I only have one account. --Yamla Powerweb (talk) 14:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. And I pointed you to WP:MEAT. What part did you not understand? I'm happy to clarify if you have specific questions. --Yamla (talk) 14:35, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was not the reason for closing my account [[User:Yamla|Yamla]Powerweb (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This was exactly the reason for closing your account. Exactly. Violations of our sockpuppetry policy. --Yamla (talk) 14:39, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. After ten years my account was closed. --Yamla Powerweb (talk) 14:40, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yep.-- Deep fried okra 15:51, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]