User talk:PowerComputer

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Emperordarius (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

PowerComputer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

79.106.109.4 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Jurgenalbanian". The reason given for Jurgenalbanian's block is: "Disruptive editing: Treating Wikipedia as a battlegro

Blocking administrator: Sandstein (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Per above, it appears that you are, in fact, Jurgenalbanian (talk), in which case this block is precisely intended to keep you from editing. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 07:41, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User:MUser has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 18:14, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User:MUser. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 18:15, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:MUser. Andrewrp^Tally-ho! 18:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for harassment. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 18:37, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PowerComputer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear sir, how can you call that harassment? The user User:Andrewrp has being reverting MY talk page. Do you think that that is right? Shouldn't I control my talk page? Don't I have any rights? While he has fully the rights to ignore my warnings about vandalism, and remove my messages on his talk page?

Decline reason:

You have the right to one Wikipedia account, to be used for the purpose of making the encyclopedia better. But you don't have the right to multiple accounts; if you think that you have solved the problems that made your original block necessary, you can request the unblocking of that account. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:50, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

MUser

Please don't move your userpage to random locations. Username change requests go to WP:CHU PirateSmackK^Arrrr! 21:44, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Avevo bisogno del tuo aiuto

Se ti sei accorto nella voce Albania, nella sezione Religione, non sono inseriti i dati realistici della religione in Albanai (in quanto non esistono statistiche) e sono stati messi dei dati che affermano che gli albanesi sono religiosi al 100% (cosa assolutamente non vera, ma anche offensiva per noi che non siamo religiosi, tipo io che sono ateo), e credo che sia neccessario modificare la voce. io ho cercato di venirne e capo, ma a quelli fanno comodo solo dati che secondo il loro sapere "sono veri". Spero nel tuo aiuto. Mandamo un messaggio!

Rrofte Shqiperia! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dessy92 (talk • contribs) 13:29, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Macintosh Revival

Hello, PowerComputer! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently seeing very little activity. We are trying to revive the project and your help would be appreciated. To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. Hope to see you in the "active" column! For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:35, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Macintosh Role Call

Hello, PowerComputer! You've listed yourself as an active member of WikiProject Macintosh, which is currently being revived. Your help would be appreciated! To see who is active and who is not, we will be listing all active members under "status pending" in the project's participant list. Please move your name to either the "former members" section or "active" section. The role call will end May 31; please move your name now if you are still interested. For more information on how to help the project, visit the How to help section at our project page! &middot MonoBot04:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Little Snitch for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little Snitch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little Snitch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StewdioMACK ^{Talk page} 15:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]