User talk:Potterhead127

June 2021

Hello, I'm Phso2. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The modification of source citations as you did here is very prejudiciable Phso2 (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Kösem Sultan, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Mehlika Sultan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please don't resubmit drafts without fixing the issues mentioned in the decline tags - this wastes reviewers' time. ASUKITE 15:01, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a reliable source that I have been asked to, yet it still says I need to add one. Potterhead127 (talk) 16:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mehlika Sultan

Hi, I noticed that an article you recently created, Mehlika Sultan, currently contains no citations. Citations are required by policy, because they allow other editors to verify the content of a page. You can read more about adding citations here, and feel free to ask me if you have any further questions. -- Asartea ^Talk ^| ^Contribs 15:04, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mehlika Sultan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mehlika Sultan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:44, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no references other than Wikipedia itself and that she existed. Potterhead127 (talk) 20:43, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehlika Sultan (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mehlika Sultan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mehlika Sultan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Potterhead127! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:54, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a source to the article. Potterhead127 (talk) 20:56, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehlika Sultan (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mehlika Sultan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mehlika Sultan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:07, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a source to the article. Potterhead127 (talk) 18:52, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehlika Sultan (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No improvement

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mehlika Sultan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mehlika Sultan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I added a relevant source, yet it was still declined. Potterhead127 (talk) 13:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are no page numbers cited, and no indication is given of what is actually in that book that discusses the topic. On top of that, it's two sentences saying basically "we know nothing"--that is the problem: lack of notability. Drmies (talk) 16:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So we’re going to forget about her even though there is evidence she existed and had a son with the sultan. Potterhead127 (talk) 09:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mehlika Sultan

Hello, Potterhead127. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mehlika Sultan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Jimfbleak. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 10:06, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]