User talk:Potter anonymous

Potter anonymous, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Potter anonymous! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:09, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Former accounts?

Before I start really going into the SPI process, have you editing using any previous accounts that have been blocked before? Ravensfire (talk) 15:57, 16 April 2020 (UTC) hi..umm Sir/Ma'am I didnt understand what you mean ??My first time here in editing any useful snippets for shows I watch..any prblem Ravensfire? please feel free to tell me if i have made any error..didnt catch what you said though!!Regards.Potter anonymous[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Krish990 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Potter anonymous (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

hey Ravensfire can yu plz tell me wuzzgoingon??Can I kow the reason why I am blocked ??Whoblocked me and what inapporopriate comment did i make that i m blocked??What account have you linked with me...I request u sirs to plz unblock my IP or my username whatever..sorry if i trespassed anything uknowingly?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potter anonymous (talk • contribs) 19:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I can slo give u my mail id if u wanna contact me (redacted) can anyone explain wat the f**k is hapening

This is en.wiki, please write in English. --Yamla (talk) 19:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Potter anonymous (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi mamYamla Firstly I dont know why I am blocked nor the reason someone has given assock puppetry of some random account calledkrish990 whic m not aware of And yes i will abide by wiki rules and promise always to not causeany kind of disruption on any wiki pages and i m here nly to edit usefully and make useful contribs to wiki pages i know of and i would consider editing wikiedia an honour and a source of joy.I am disapointed with why I have been blocked in the first lace and why i am being amde to do all this?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potter anonymous (talk • contribs) 19:44, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. Discussion on user talk not resolved --Deep fried okra User talk:Deepfriedokra 23:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Krish990 (talk · contribs): [1], [2], [3]
Siddiq X (talk · contribs): [4], [5]
Saridhvij23 (talk · contribs): [6], [7]
Nandita raizada (talk · contribs): [8]
Potter anonymous (talk · contribs): [9]

Notice how they all put Ritvik Arora in the "main cast", and most of them put him in the lead and infobox. Krish990 was a single-purpose account dedicated to edit warring over this. These accounts are clearly either sock puppets or meat puppets. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:50, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Potter anonymous (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi sir NinjaRobotPirate Sir I request you to please not intermingle with wall these users or puppets.I was editing this page as normally as i was dong the other pages and I even mentioned in minor edit section that in title song how credits were,I metioned them that way,That was my only intention sir.lease forgive me and I am a first time user,I dont want any blocks placed on my IP or a tarnish o my username sir please.I prmise not to meddle with the security of any article and I had no intention either sir to place ritvik in lead role,i jus wanted to edit surnames and change cast asper equetial order like 1-4 sir ..sorry if that minoredit ont his semiprotected page has made me so wrong.I am a first timeuser,Iassure ou mam Yamla and i shall not revert norcause any edit warrins mam ..I haveno connection withanyof the usersmentioned above byhim and i want my IPemail and account to be safe and unblcked so i can make my usefulness valid madam/sir, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Potter anonymous (talk • contribs) 20:51, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Hi Potter anonymous, this is a tricky situation. Your unblock appeal does not really address the issue that led to the block, and there are severe communication issues between the reviewing administrators and you. Please consider using a different Wikipedia (meta:List of Wikipedias) in a language you are more comfortable with. If you would like to continue editing on the English Wikipedia, please have a look at the Standard Offer and our guide for dealing with sockpuppetry blocks. Please do not make another appeal within the next 6 months, or your access to this talk page may be removed to prevent further disruption. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:29, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Are you really sure about this. If you're sure then why are you doing the same editing i.e putting Ritvik Arora and Kaveri Priyam into the "Main" section as Krish990 and other sockpuppets have done earlier? First there was a sockpupet of Krish990 as Siddiq X, then there was an another sockpuppet as Saridhvij23, and then there was another an sockpuppet Nandita raizada. We are seeing the same type of edits that Krish990 has done which are copied by his sockpuppets, so it's obvious that you might be the sockpuppet of Krish990 because your edits are similar to his so that's why we have blocked you. And also don't try to fool us by saying that you don't even know Krish990 and you aren't aware of him. We only want to hear the truth. We are the Great (talk) 20:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]