User talk:Potpart

Your submission at Articles for creation: EV&A Architects (August 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; possible WP:NCORP failure, and reads too much liked placed PR (an infringement on WP:NOTPROMO)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EV&A Architects and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:EV&A Architects, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 01:39, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edward Vance has been accepted

Edward Vance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chetsford (talk) 01:07, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

October 2019

Hello, I'm Chetsford. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User talk:Chetsford have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Specifically, you deleted my comments from my Talk page in violation of WP:TALKO (see: [1]). Please be mindful of our policies. Chetsford (talk) 14:35, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Chetsford: I am sorry, I deleted the comments after I read it because I thought it no longer had any point being there.Potpart (talk) 20:23, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You thought wrong. Chetsford (talk) 20:35, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Won't happen again.Potpart (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy tagging

You are a new editor with almost no experience. You should not be tagging articles for speedy deletion. The WP:CSD#G11 tag you placed at Pediped Footwear was completely without merit. If you do more tagging in the future, you risk being blocked for abuse of process.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Hello, I get that I am a new editor but that article might fall short of notability guidelines and under unambigous advertising. Wouldn´t it be good for the Wikipedia to review it? Potpart (talk) 17:51, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EV&A Architects (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Deepfriedokra was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EV&A Architects and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:EV&A Architects, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Deep fried okra 01:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Potpart! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- Deep fried okra 01:54, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Potpart. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Craig Drummond, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 06:48, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reminding me, I understand Wikipedia policy. I would like to inform you that I don't have any relation with the subject of the article. Potpart (talk) 10:50, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You've uploaded File:Craig W. Drummond.jpg as your own work. Where did you acquire the photo, if not from Mr. Drummond? Wikishovel (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I get it from LinkedIn. I contacted him there as I want to know about him and also asked his permission. Potpart (talk) 15:31, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a photo from his LinkedIn. And if you're writing an article with his permission, then you have an obvious WP: Conflict of interest. Wikishovel (talk) 17:30, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted him for an interview and requested his photo to use in the article. This article reflects my perspective on him based on my research. I welcome anyone who wishes to contribute or challenge my views with facts and evidence. Potpart (talk) 07:53, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Craig Drummond. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 08:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Craig Drummond for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Craig Drummond is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Craig Drummond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Wikishovel (talk) 10:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]