User talk:Poster777

Welcome!

Hello, Poster777, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Toddy1 (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Yeraz, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Yeraz was changed by Poster777 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872468 on 2012-01-28T16:58:54+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

Your first priority in such a case is to avoid being banned. So act without flaw, avoid all forms of personal attacks and edit warring, and be overly polite. Only make well-supported and well written edits, and discuss anything that might be cause for problem.

You might be banned anyway so you should first make sure you have friends who can support you if that would happen. You will also need allies when you edit the article, otherwise the others can always gang up and revert your edits, splitting the reverts among each other and thus avoiding the 3-reverts rule.

Good luck!

Juice Leskinen 16:10, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contribution to the article on Black January. Please can you provide a citation for this information. If you do not provide a citation, it will almost certainly be deleted. The way to format a citation is <ref>Blyton, Enid, ''The January Massacre'', pub Harpur Collins, 1956, p85.</ref>. Thanks.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:52, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at WP:AN. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Calling editors "mentally sick armenian users" is a personal attack, and not allowed. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 13:52, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-sense

I hardly understand your answer:

do you really believe that only Armenians are interested in Armenian history? in any case, I'm repeating it, I'm not Armenian, and I have absolutely no problem with my origins
you should have a look at my contributions here before stating "The articles that you treat and guard night and day are of armenian interest"

On top, comment on contributions, not on users.
Sardur (talk) 14:24, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 14:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your message on my page, your account cannot be deleted. WP:AN is the page where you wrote your message to the administrators, and is the page where you made the personal attacks. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 15:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To the administrator which run immediately to block me as soon as touched the interests of wikipedia: thanks for blocking me, either your measure of "ethinc insults" is attributed only on base of yoru personal friendly realtions with users. While the article "yeraz" deliberately and openly offending azeri people is protected by you on purpose, you block the user which said nothing more than a legitimate request of deletion of insults and falsification...If the offended user is not yoru "friend" it is ok, you will not take care of that...i got how wikipedia works by a long time, and now you show it by your behaviour openly... however the article "yeraz" iz higly offensive. The false spreading user wikiboer wrote this to me (there is no prove about existance of some "clan yeraz" so it is enough to define wikiboer as "false spreader" a he wrote the article on the bas eof folks heard ther and here, if he will prove it, i will apologise. Also the "long lasting clan since soviets" is totally false as i proved its falsity by the hierarchy system of soviets which was decided from kremlin, not from locals):

"Hi Poster777. You are attempting a major rewrite of this article. The problem is, you are removing large sections of referenced information and you are adding big sections of text which up to now had not included a reference even. I saw on a noticeboard that you do not even want this article to exist, because the term Yeraz is very insulting in Azerbaijan, and is similar to calling someone a nigger. Well this is an encyclopedia, and there is a nigger article because people need to learn about the term and its history. If you want to work on this article constructively, you'll first have to stop deleting large sections of referenced texts, and go about editing in a more constructive way. Wikiboer (talk) 14:38, 31 January 2012 (UTC)"

it is really funny, he is kidding me opnely and you know it perfectly, i'm not silly...first of all i didn't remove "large" sections of "refrenced" information as those references are not neutral, neither true, those are references feeded by second or third hand, they are not official, scientific sources, but just non official NGOs informed by unknown singles which usually give an opinion on personal interests!!! How such sources may be used to wrote an article on ethnic matters on historical background which might be scientific, not political???? are the scientists dismissed, disappered forever? why you don't use the scientist, authorised, trusted sources???!!!!. Then the article "nigger" clearly states that the word "nigger" is a slur, insult, racist definition. While the article "yeraz" is written with clear hate to the persons to which it is referred also presenting this word as something "normal", as normal word...it presents "yeraz" az soma mafia people with wild nature and without any past. These azeris didn't just "left" armenia, they were forced by brutality to leave!!! and there are tons of official sources, documents archives proving it!!! That article written by those who probably never have been to azerbaijan and no matter, they rpetend to be the protected exclusive editors of articles about its internal structures, persons, habits!!!! it is shame, it is not enciclopedia!!! Furthermore tha article "yeraz" is full of deliberate disinformation about my country, it's government and leaders. The article "yeraz" is contradciting itself - by one side it spaks about some unite mysterious yeraz clan which is on power who knows how and why, by other side it speaks about the "yeraz" president which sacks his own "yeraz" minister for corruption...it is really ridiculous, low level article...this is wikipedia quality??? It speaks about non existent clans, it falsificates the history clearly, without any shame. Do you think really that i offended some user here on ethnic base or etc? well, then you don't know what is the real insult!!! i'd bring to you tons of examples of disgusting insults written by the armenians all over in internet!!! Look at your editors who are!!! the anonymous, casually passing by people without any background or knowledge, without any autorisation pretend to re-write the story and to be accepted as "dogma", on the top of google searches!!!! as i checked out personally - anybody can register and edit things here, write the articles. I did it, I got registered and edited. If i had my own "support team" stornger than the others my editions would stay there no matter if they are wrong or right!!!! this is how you work here!!! it is really ridiculous! I have sent some claim to the appropriate organisations of human rights regarding the ethnic, racist insult that you propaganda on your pages by the article "yeraz". I will use my rights to boycott your website everywhere and tell everywhere all the falsities that are protected by you on wikipedia pages, informing the people on your methods of work. Your "rules" are applied only when it is ok for you. I have asked you to remove any article which touches this conflicted issue: azeri armenian, as you are not able or you simply don't want to treat these issues with more neutrality, sensibility equally and seriously to both sides...as you know perfectly, you have rceived a lot of protests claiming the artcile "yeraz" as offensive, but you ignored it...now i hope somebody from out will give the best decision on these matters... i really hope that wikipedia soon will stop being considered seriously by anybody and so it will stop being used as referenced. The idea of wikipedia and it's mechanism of working is out of any logics, it is a blasphemy towards the history, i'm surprised that it is still existing!!! see what people tell about you around! http://www.philipcoppens.com/wikiworld.html http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-truth-according-to-wikipedia/ http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wikiwoo.htm#Finale and it is just a few part of bad opinion that is among readers!!! i'm happy that people is not so "easy" to handle...(Poster777 (talk) 13:35, 2 February 2012 (UTC))[reply]