User talk:Possum2?

SCECGS, Redlands

"Slander"? No, I am afraid that libel and slander, which are now wrapped up in "defamation" in NSW law (are you taking legal counsel?) are comprehensively responded to in NSW law in the defence of truth. And nothing that has been said in this article about the notoriously scandalous SCECGS is other than truthful, alas. Masalai 10:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps slander isn't the correct word, however the nature and tone of your additions are, if not slanderous, then clearly in breach of Wikipedia's Neutrality policy. You have also failed to source any of the claims that you have made. 10:10, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

What is your interest in SCECGS, Redlands, Possum? One must assume that you do indeed have a considerable financial interest; otherwise why would you be so concerned with the reporting on its outrages over the past 30 years? Might I, incidentally, suggest that you try to address the grammatical and spelling howlers in your contributions? It doesn't much help your presumed partisanship for SCECGS, Redlands if you come across as an illiterate.Masalai 10:50, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]