User talk:Portugal1337

Portugal1337, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Portugal1337! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tue (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UnitedStatesian was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Tue instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You should suggest changes to existing articles on the talkpage for that article, in this case Talk:Turkish language. Do not submit such proposed changes as drafts.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Portugal1337/sandbox/Tue and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Portugal1337/sandbox/Tue, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:12, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request for article expansion support

Hello and Greetings,

I was looking for some support in article expansion of Draft:Aurat (word) by any chance if you have access to the Turkish language source. Pl. do visit the article Draft:Aurat (word) and support expansion of the article if you find topic interested in.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 10:06, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I have added the Ottoman spelling, meaning and updated the transliteration. I also added the note that the use of the word "avrat" in Modern Turkish is dated, but that it is still used to humorous effect. I will try to see if there's anything else I can add to the article -- The topic seems really interesting!

Portugal1337 (talk) 21:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Covid-19 death per capita map in Europe

Hello, I've noticed you've been updating this map occasionally, by uploading new .png versions and linking them in the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe article. There is better way to update images in Wikipedia. In the image's description page in Wikimedia Commons, at the bottom of the "File history" section, there is a link labelled "Upload a new version of this file". If you click on it and follow the wizard, the image will be updated automatically on every page where it is used, and the previous versions will be kept in the description page. Moreover, when it comes to maps, the .svg format is usually used, as they are in certain ways more easily editable, and they don't get blurry when zooming, however that isn't a mandatory restriction. Thanks for helping. :) --Antondimak (talk) 23:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you so much for this message! I'm a (very) new editor so feedback like this is invaluable. Portugal1337 (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — Diannaa (talk) 22:24, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Portugal1337 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Portugal1337 (talk) 22:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Hi there. I don't have another account. I do share WiFi with four other people so if this is a WiFi/IP issue, I do not exactly know how to prove that I don't have another account. And I'm really trying hard to save the Featured Article status of the Istanbul article, see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_review/Istanbul/archive1#Istanbul so I would appreciate it if I could get unblocked.

The guide on blocking talks about the purposes of blocking: (1) preventing imminent or continuing damage and disruption to Wikipedia; (2) deterring the continuation of present, disruptive behavior; and (3) encouraging a more productive, congenial editing style within community norms.

Have I been engaged in disruptive behavior? Created any damage?

I don't even know what the copyright violations and concerns are. I can't respond to an accusation that isn't explicitly stated.

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry is extremely likely here and you've given no plausible explanation to address the concerns. Indeed, you haven't even mentioned the copyright violations. Though as you suspect, that's only a secondary concern given the very, very high likelihood of WP:SOCK violations. Yamla (talk) 22:58, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal1337 (talk) 23:30, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your draft article, User:Portugal1337/sandbox/Tue

Hello, Portugal1337. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/Tue".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:18, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]