User talk:Pootika fresh

October 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Godfather (2022 film), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:47, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kolamaavu Kokila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page VJ. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, User:Jayashankar8022. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. — Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:33, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The same user making my edits undo... Pootika fresh (talk) 03:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pootika fresh I've undone your edits because you are persistently removing some of the article contents without proper explanation, removing references, and changing several new images to old ones. Remember that constructive edits are always appreciated. Please try to understand the guidelines and policies of Wikipedia. Jayashankar8022 (talk) 05:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

@Pootika fresh This edit [1] you made in 2018, where you changed the actual box office figures, which was given according to the source, appears to be non-constructive. Another edit you made[2] in Rajamanikyam, where you restored the revision that contained an unreliable source, is also unacceptable. Keep in mind that persistent disruptive editing may result in a block or ban.Jayashankar8022 (talk) 06:20, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jayashankar8022 (talk) 07:02, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Eswaran Naveen per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eswaran Naveen. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Eswaran Naveen per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eswaran Naveen. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

RoySmith (talk) 00:48, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]