User talk:Poolroadrunner

David Pearson (computer scientist)

Thanks for creating David Pearson (computer scientist), Poolroadrunner!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great article!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Poolroadrunner, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Poolroadrunner! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Pearson (computer scientist)

The article David Pearson (computer scientist) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Vanity article produced by the subject, the refences to do mention the subject or support the statements they are attributed to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hardyplants (talk) 00:16, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE DELETE THE ENTIRE ARTICLE, HARDYPLANTS. THANKS, DAVID PEARSON. 24.207.103.36 (talk) 02:06, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE DELETE IMMEDIATELY. I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE UNDERMINING OF EDITOR INTEGRITY INPUT OF LATE WHICH IS UNDERMINING THE INTEGRITY OF WIKIPEDIA ITSELF. I AM INCREASINGLY CONCERNED ABOUT WIKIPEDIA SAFETY. Poolroadrunner (talk) 03:12, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RUSSIAN INFLUENCE? Poolroadrunner (talk) 03:25, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Pearson (computer scientist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Pearson (computer scientist), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pearson (computer scientist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Pearson (computer scientist). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. XOR'easter (talk) 03:54, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Poolroadrunner. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- TNT (talk • she/her) 04:49, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]